Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mohammad Chaudhry

Internal Medicine Union City, NJ Medical Doctor

NPI 1033119573 CMS profile 137881

570 32Nd St, Union City, NJ 07087

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,500

402 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mohammad Chaudhry of Union City, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,500 across 402 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $808 21
2024 General $838 35
2023 General $1,474 80
2022 General $1,636 91
2021 General $997 53
2020 General $781 54
2019 General $964 68

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mohammad Chaudhry
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mohammad Chaudhry were reported at $808. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Mohammad Chaudhry Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $964 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $781 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $997 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,636 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,474 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $838 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $808 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,338 60 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $771 47 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $767 48 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $627 34 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $475 44 payments
  6. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $403 29 payments
  7. Medtronic, Inc. $296 2 payments
  8. Abiomed $231 2 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $227 16 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $178 12 payments
  11. Other $2,186 108 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,478 400 payments
  2. Education $21 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $704 31 payments
  2. Ozempic $641 46 payments
  3. BREZTRI $599 17 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $566 41 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $530 36 payments
  6. MOUNJARO $376 16 payments
  7. XIFAXAN $313 23 payments
  8. Repatha $286 26 payments
  9. Impella $231 2 payments
  10. Otezla $230 20 payments
  11. Other $5,383 300 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 241 drugs

Part D claims

44,366

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$7,492,042

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

31.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 1,822 $1,888,291
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 608 $646,970
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 436 $611,670
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 389 $442,541
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 419 $431,724
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 664 $415,227
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 427 $408,884
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 232 $217,687
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 298 $212,024
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 239 $176,161

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 241 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$109,307

Of which drugs: $8,955

Medicare patients

366

Average age 75

Services billed

2,054

246 women, 120 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Osteoporosis 25%
COPD 22%
Alzheimer's or dementia 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 71 71 $5,809
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from recombinant dna 90673 Office 11 11 $900
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 14 14 $823
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 23 200 $40

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $120
$120 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $113
$113 239 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $73
$73 1,822 —
IBSRELA
  • Ardelyx, Inc. $39
$39 — —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $38
$38 26 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

402 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record