Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mohamed Kattih

Rancho Cucamonga, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1104833383 CMS profile 4519

10841 White Oak Ave Ste 100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,087

27 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mohamed Kattih of Rancho Cucamonga, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,087 across 27 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $30 1
2022 General $1,512 15
2021 General $427 6
2020 General $117 5

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mohamed Kattih
  • California median
  • Middle half of California
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mohamed Kattih were reported at $30. Among 98,626 California profiles paid that year, the median was $172 and the middle half received between $54 and $610.

Show as a table
Year Mohamed Kattih California median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $161 $50–$652 $163
2020 $117 $114 $34–$392 $114
2021 $427 $137 $41–$509 $132
2022 $1,512 $152 $48–$573 $149
2023 $0 $162 $50–$581 $160
2024 $0 $162 $52–$583 $164
2025 $30 $172 $54–$610 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $1,922 20 payments
  2. Nevro Corp. $90 4 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $45 2 payments
  4. Protega Pharmaceutials LLC $30 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Travel and Lodging $1,173 6 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $914 21 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $1,504 14 payments
  2. NVISION Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $262 2 payments
  3. Vanta $115 1 payment
  4. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $90 4 payments
  5. ROXYBOND $30 1 payment
  6. NVISION Spinal Cord Neurostimulation/Drug Infusion Systems $28 1 payment
  7. VANTA ADAPTIVESTIM $8 1 payment
  8. INTELLIS $5 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

1,502

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 276

Drug cost

$34,160

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $5,921

Branded share of claims

25%

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 11.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 17 $9,230
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 232 $5,256
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 12 $3,763
Gabapentin Generic 421 $3,467
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 20 $3,292
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 67 $2,726
Baclofen Generic 128 $1,708
Pregabalin Generic 86 $1,220
Methocarbamol Generic 93 $552
Acetaminophen-Codeine Acetaminophen With Codeine Brand 47 $512

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,591 Part D prescribers listed as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$76,502

Of which drugs: $568

Medicare patients

86

Average age 69

Services billed

5,279

47 women, 39 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 44%
Depression 35%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
COPD 26%
Osteoporosis 23%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 34 4,342 $440
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 14 14 $100
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 21 28 $3

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

27 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record