Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mitzi Barmatz

Urology Tucson, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1700888039 CMS profile 304449

2260 W Orange Grove Rd, Tucson, AZ 85741

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$135,297

355 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$21,703 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2024

Through program year 2025, Mitzi Barmatz of Tucson, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $135,297 across 355 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $21,703 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Urology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,019 33
2024 General $17,975 78
2023 General $15,438 51
2022 General $19,403 56
2021 General $11,479 44
2020 General $19,171 51
2019 General $50,810 42

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mitzi Barmatz
  • Urology median
  • Middle half of Urology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mitzi Barmatz were reported at $1,019. Among 9,461 Urology profiles paid that year, the median was $629 and the middle half received between $190 and $1,620.

Show as a table
Year Mitzi Barmatz Urology median Middle half National median
2019 $50,810 $480 $147–$1,201 $163
2020 $19,171 $246 $87–$645 $114
2021 $11,479 $358 $111–$1,000 $132
2022 $19,403 $476 $143–$1,263 $149
2023 $15,438 $560 $168–$1,461 $160
2024 $17,975 $563 $170–$1,464 $164
2025 $1,019 $629 $190–$1,620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Coloplast Corp $71,305 113 payments
  2. Caldera Medical, Inc $55,394 71 payments
  3. NeoTract Inc. $1,690 14 payments
  4. Teleflex LLC $1,205 9 payments
  5. Bluewind Medical $1,150 6 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $828 25 payments
  7. Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. $455 10 payments
  8. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $413 5 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $383 15 payments
  10. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $310 12 payments
  11. Other $2,161 75 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $93,497 12 payments
  2. Education $20,197 9 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $11,746 290 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $9,731 41 payments
  5. Gift $126 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Altis Women's Health $56,080 75 payments
  2. Desara $55,241 69 payments
  3. Vertessa $42,855 3 payments
  4. ALTIS Female Incontinence $13,296 16 payments
  5. UROLIFT $2,488 20 payments
  6. REVI $1,053 5 payments
  7. INTERSTIM $760 23 payments
  8. Saffron $478 3 payments
  9. Restorelle $457 1 payment
  10. Axonics $443 9 payments
  11. Other $5,067 151 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 22 drugs

Part D claims

1,345

Median for Urology: 1,053

Drug cost

$255,956

Median for Urology: $101,464

Branded share of claims

38.3%

Median for Urology: 27.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 128 $113,884
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 98 $97,513
Estradiol Generic 229 $14,369
Premarin Estrogens, Conjugated Brand 18 $8,061
Mirabegron Er Mirabegron Brand 14 $6,397
Methenamine Hippurate Generic 53 $5,975
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 120 $1,840
Cephalexin Generic 182 $1,514
Finasteride Generic 78 $1,161
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst Brand 57 $1,133

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 22 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,221 Part D prescribers listed as Urology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 96 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$267,688

Of which drugs: $33,914

Medicare patients

812

Average age 76

Services billed

14,286

583 women, 229 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 52%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 23%
Osteoporosis 23%
Diabetes 22%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Cancer 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Bcg live intravesical instillation, 1 mg J9030 Office 14 652 $1,486

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ORGOVYX
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $203
  • PFIZER INC. $4
$208 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $77
$77 — —
JELMYTO
  • UROGEN PHARMA, INC. $35
$35 — —
PYLARIFY
  • Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $28
$28 — —
ADSTILADRIN
  • Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. $20
$20 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

355 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Urology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record