Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mitchell Whitehead

Family Medicine Pensacola, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1427460526 CMS profile 1144389

5100 N 12Th Ave Ste 201, Ste B, Pensacola, FL 32504

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$82,924

624 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$539

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,208,373 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Mitchell Whitehead of Pensacola, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $82,924 across 624 general payments and $539 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,208,373 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $42,911 40
2024 General $28,510 61
2023 General $1,370 85
2023 Research $539 1
2022 General $2,021 118
2021 General $2,174 104
2020 General $1,749 88
2019 General $4,190 128

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mitchell Whitehead
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mitchell Whitehead were reported at $42,911. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Mitchell Whitehead Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $4,190 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,749 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,174 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,021 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,370 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $28,510 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $42,911 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kedplasma LLC $69,025 21 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $4,464 69 payments
  3. ViiV Healthcare Company $3,219 148 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,156 86 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $659 44 payments
  6. Theratechnologies Inc. $470 16 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $461 28 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $424 33 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $369 22 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $324 22 payments
  11. Other $2,353 135 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $71,165 22 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $11,570 600 payments
  3. Education $189 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DOVATO $2,216 117 payments
  2. Truvada $2,140 1 payment
  3. SYMTUZA $532 25 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $484 31 payments
  5. UBRELVY $462 33 payments
  6. Descovy $423 4 payments
  7. EGRIFTA $381 15 payments
  8. Ozempic $376 28 payments
  9. QULIPTA $355 29 payments
  10. PIFELTRO $339 19 payments
  11. Other $6,210 386 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $539 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 163 drugs

Part D claims

10,282

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$5,765,405

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

29.6%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 489 $1,898,169
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 186 $596,117
Symtuza Darunavir/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alaf Brand 77 $355,576
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 149 $323,930
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 142 $318,139
Serostim Somatropin Brand 14 $286,492
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 71 $263,306
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 71 $243,181
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 60 $204,044
Genvoya Elviteg/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alafen Brand 50 $194,142

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 163 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$57,217

Of which drugs: $2,047

Medicare patients

306

Average age 66

Services billed

1,159

92 women, 214 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 42%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Depression 24%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
COPD 18%
Cancer 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 12 12 $433

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DOVATO
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $226
$226 186 —
Descovy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $125
$125 149 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $111
$111 11 —
DELSTRIGO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $59
$59 — —
APRETUDE
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $52
$52 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

625 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record