Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mitchell Psotka

Cardiovascular Disease Falls Church, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1942525381 CMS profile 1388031

3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA 22042

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$34,661

44 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$211,427 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2022

Through program year 2024, Mitchell Psotka of Falls Church, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $34,661 across 44 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $211,427 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $20 1
2023 General $4,348 4
2022 General $152 2
2021 General $189 5
2020 General $23,500 10
2019 General $6,452 22

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mitchell Psotka
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mitchell Psotka were reported at $0. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Mitchell Psotka Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $6,452 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $23,500 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $189 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $152 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $4,348 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $20 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $0 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Amgen Inc. $28,982 8 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,181 1 payment
  3. Abbott Laboratories $664 10 payments
  4. United Therapeutics Corporation $311 13 payments
  5. Abiomed $162 3 payments
  6. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $140 2 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $103 1 payment
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $39 2 payments
  9. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $36 2 payments
  10. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $23 1 payment
  11. Other $20 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Consulting Fee $28,545 6 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $4,181 1 payment
  3. Food and Beverage $1,538 34 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $398 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Corlanor $11,381 3 payments
  2. JARDIANCE $4,181 1 payment
  3. HeartMate $265 2 payments
  4. ORENITRAM $251 10 payments
  5. HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Dev $250 4 payments
  6. Impella $162 3 payments
  7. VERQUVO Cardiovascular $103 1 payment
  8. VERQUVO Cardiovascular $103 1 payment
  9. BOSENTAN $100 1 payment
  10. THORATEC HEARTMATE 3 LVAS IMPLANT KIT $89 1 payment
  11. Other $313 13 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 14 drugs

Part D claims

419

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$663,474

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

36.3%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vyndamax Tafamidis Brand 23 $509,609
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 45 $66,936
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 39 $49,102
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 27 $31,020
Eplerenone Generic 44 $2,392
Tadalafil Generic 25 $1,912
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 48 $986
Torsemide Generic 23 $535
Spironolactone Generic 42 $302
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 18 $205

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 14 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$42,186

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

126

Average age 72

Services billed

404

34 women, 92 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Heart failure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 75%
Chronic kidney disease 71%
Atrial fibrillation 61%
Diabetes 55%
Arthritis 52%
COPD 28%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ORENITRAM
  • United Therapeutics Corporation $10
$10 — —
REMODULIN
  • United Therapeutics Corporation $10
$10 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

44 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record