Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mitchell Pitlick

Allergy & Immunology Omaha, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1073044574 CMS profile 4213352

2808 South 80Th Avenue, Suite 210, Omaha, NE 68124

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$26,477

425 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mitchell Pitlick of Omaha, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $26,477 across 425 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Allergy & Immunology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $20,859 185
2024 General $4,152 180
2023 General $1,442 59
2022 General $24 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mitchell Pitlick
  • Allergy & Immunology median
  • Middle half of Allergy & Immunology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mitchell Pitlick were reported at $20,859. Among 2,466 Allergy & Immunology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,140 and the middle half received between $272 and $2,892.

Show as a table
Year Mitchell Pitlick Allergy & Immunology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $594 $163–$1,512 $163
2020 $0 $426 $106–$1,233 $114
2021 $0 $638 $157–$1,708 $132
2022 $24 $790 $205–$1,961 $149
2023 $1,442 $852 $220–$2,147 $160
2024 $4,152 $865 $203–$2,267 $164
2025 $20,859 $1,140 $272–$2,892 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $19,093 94 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $1,713 79 payments
  3. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1,412 26 payments
  4. CSL Behring $470 29 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $407 36 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $376 13 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $350 17 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $342 21 payments
  9. Grifols USA, LLC $317 15 payments
  10. Pharming Healthcare, Inc. $295 10 payments
  11. Other $1,702 85 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $15,440 10 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $9,542 411 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $1,415 2 payments
  4. Education $80 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. FASENRA $18,151 61 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Immunology $2,171 106 payments
  3. AIRSUPRA $866 13 payments
  4. BREZTRI $772 8 payments
  5. Hizentra $429 26 payments
  6. Xolair $376 13 payments
  7. TEZSPIRE Respiratory $345 2 payments
  8. TEZSPIRE Inflammation $321 16 payments
  9. RUCONEST $295 10 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $266 17 payments
  11. Other $3,365 182 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

292

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 449

Drug cost

$88,433

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: $169,700

Branded share of claims

45.9%

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 37.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xolair Omalizumab Brand 13 $36,681
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 37 $25,636
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 32 $17,806
Arnuity Ellipta Fluticasone Furoate Brand 19 $3,525
Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 14 $1,760
Ipratropium Bromide Generic 58 $1,318
Montelukast Sodium Generic 46 $642
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 19 $468
Fluticasone Propionate Generic 28 $371
Famotidine Generic 12 $185

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,579 Part D prescribers listed as Allergy/ Immunology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$166,856

Of which drugs: $132,996

Medicare patients

202

Average age 72

Services billed

9,446

143 women, 59 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 57%
Depression 26%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Diabetes 18%
COPD 18%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Osteoporosis 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, omalizumab, 5 mg J2357 Office 12 2,520 $75,082

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $791
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $172
$963 — —
FASENRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $624
$624 — —
TEZSPIRE
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $160
  • Amgen Inc. $111
$271 — —
Hizentra
  • CSL Behring $218
$218 — —
RUCONEST
  • Pharming Healthcare, Inc. $196
$196 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

425 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Allergy & Immunology in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record