Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mitchell Bober

Family Medicine Pennsville, NJ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1902805013 CMS profile 267407

181 N Broadway, Pennsville, NJ 08070

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,182

290 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mitchell Bober of Pennsville, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,182 across 290 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $46 3
2024 General $1,162 69
2023 General $1,005 67
2022 General $557 40
2021 General $553 41
2020 General $173 12
2019 General $685 58

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mitchell Bober
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mitchell Bober were reported at $46. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Mitchell Bober Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $685 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $173 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $553 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $557 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,005 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,162 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $46 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,256 76 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $589 47 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $478 38 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $442 37 payments
  5. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $249 18 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $210 14 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $163 10 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $77 5 payments
  9. Exact Sciences Corporation $70 4 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $68 5 payments
  11. Other $579 36 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,161 289 payments
  2. Education $21 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BREZTRI $549 29 payments
  2. FARXIGA $462 24 payments
  3. Ozempic $414 32 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $340 22 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $306 24 payments
  6. AIRSUPRA $261 12 payments
  7. UBRELVY $257 19 payments
  8. QULIPTA $255 22 payments
  9. AREXVY $253 20 payments
  10. Livalo $233 17 payments
  11. Other $2,590 178 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 187 drugs

Part D claims

16,842

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,296,332

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

19.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 168 $199,920
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 156 $153,692
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 62 $103,403
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 72 $73,964
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 69 $62,095
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 56 $60,461
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 52 $59,481
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 41 $42,401
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 33 $37,282
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 56 $30,119

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 187 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$251,020

Of which drugs: $17,983

Medicare patients

803

Average age 75

Services billed

3,785

455 women, 348 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 36%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Cancer 15%
Heart failure 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 33 33 $9,639
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 96 98 $7,949
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 11 422 $39

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$192 — —
FARXIGA
$176 72 —
RYBELSUS
$80 — —
Ozempic
$80 33 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$76 69 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

290 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record