Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Miguel Araneo

Medical Oncology Lake Worth, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1053426783 CMS profile 274265

4685 S Congress Ave, Suite 200, Lake Worth, FL 33461

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29,123

1,287 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Miguel Araneo of Lake Worth, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29,123 across 1,287 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,207 206
2024 General $5,542 212
2023 General $4,371 192
2022 General $4,244 203
2021 General $3,513 167
2020 General $2,690 135
2019 General $3,555 172

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Miguel Araneo
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Miguel Araneo were reported at $5,207. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Miguel Araneo Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,555 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $2,690 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $3,513 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $4,244 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $4,371 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $5,542 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $5,207 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,611 82 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,597 78 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,497 70 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,468 103 payments
  5. Celgene Corporation $1,295 56 payments
  6. Sirtex Medical Inc $1,260 16 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $1,169 43 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $1,077 33 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,039 61 payments
  10. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $1,029 48 payments
  11. Other $16,080 697 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $27,211 1,254 payments
  2. Education $1,799 32 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $113 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $1,497 70 payments
  2. SIR-Spheres Microspheres $1,260 16 payments
  3. OPDIVO $1,199 58 payments
  4. SARCLISA $889 30 payments
  5. XTANDI $774 46 payments
  6. JAKAFI $639 26 payments
  7. REBLOZYL $624 30 payments
  8. XT CDX $570 15 payments
  9. Doptelet $533 28 payments
  10. ENHERTU $532 17 payments
  11. Other $25,713 1,298 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

808

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$3,315,402

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

49.8%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lenalidomide Generic 42 $683,210
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 50 $669,793
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 20 $467,726
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 29 $387,003
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 22 $361,459
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 17 $272,568
Promacta Eltrombopag Olamine Brand 13 $197,567
Erleada Apalutamide Brand 11 $166,125
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 41 $31,329
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 12 $30,763

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 107 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,515,709

Of which drugs: $1,334,233

Medicare patients

400

Average age 77

Services billed

115,771

210 women, 190 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Chronic kidney disease 50%
Ischemic heart disease 48%
Diabetes 44%
Heart failure 35%
Cancer 32%
Depression 32%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, darbepoetin alfa, 1 microgram (non-esrd use) J0881 Office 20 22,300 $51,388
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 34 54,000 $47,164
Injection, epoetin alfa, (for non-esrd use), 1000 units J0885 Office 13 880 $5,545
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 64 269 $137

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 73 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SARCLISA
$301 — —
ENHERTU
$260 — —
KEYTRUDA
$208 — —
Pomalyst
$208 20 —
CABOMETYX
$184 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 73 with Patron

Records

1,287 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record