Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michelle Ladewig

Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care Gainesville, GA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1821447434 CMS profile 10975591

667 Lanier Park Dr, Gainesville, GA 30501

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,176

329 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michelle Ladewig of Gainesville, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,176 across 329 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $858 41
2024 General $810 37
2023 General $1,030 47
2022 General $2,649 109
2021 General $1,828 95

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michelle Ladewig
  • Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michelle Ladewig were reported at $858. Among 4,814 Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care profiles paid that year, the median was $169 and the middle half received between $51 and $499.

Show as a table
Year Michelle Ladewig Nurse Practitioner, Primary Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $1,828 $137 $39–$445 $132
2022 $2,649 $139 $44–$421 $149
2023 $1,030 $163 $53–$481 $160
2024 $810 $176 $54–$511 $164
2025 $858 $169 $51–$499 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,864 68 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $516 29 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $403 13 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $393 15 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $365 19 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $324 17 payments
  7. BioCryst US Sales Co., LLC $305 13 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $269 15 payments
  9. Grifols USA, LLC $237 13 payments
  10. Mylan Specialty L.P. $231 12 payments
  11. Other $2,267 115 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,176 329 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. DUPIXENT $767 25 payments
  2. TEZSPIRE $561 13 payments
  3. FASENRA $524 22 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $396 23 payments
  5. Orladeyo $305 13 payments
  6. BREZTRI $249 13 payments
  7. YUPELRI $248 13 payments
  8. MOUNJARO $238 13 payments
  9. CUVITRU $229 9 payments
  10. Xembify $214 12 payments
  11. Other $4,607 230 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 110 drugs

Part D claims

5,466

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$486,092

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

20.1%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 140 $164,832
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 54 $56,997
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 43 $37,152
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 54 $36,065
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 24 $27,926
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 25 $22,789
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 32 $20,303
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 17 $16,531
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 12 $13,343
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 11 $9,484

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 110 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$80,102

Of which drugs: $19,434

Medicare patients

374

Average age 76

Services billed

3,922

260 women, 114 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 44%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Diabetes 27%
Osteoporosis 23%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Heart failure 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 12 840 $17,088
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 42 42 $1,517
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 27 1,724 $173
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 21 26 $9
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 12 99 $6

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LOKELMA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $121
$121 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $88
  • Lilly USA, LLC $7
$95 43 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $57
$57 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $46
$46 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $45
$45 140 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

329 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record