Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michelle Betz

Neurology Virginia Beach, VA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1982862561 CMS profile 181308

1950 Glenn Mitchell Dr Ste 200, Virginia Beach, VA 23456

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$250,370

248 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$2,081

Paid to them · 14 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,000,981 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Michelle Betz of Virginia Beach, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $250,370 across 248 general payments and $2,081 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,000,981 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $48,056 45
2024 General $33,314 36
2023 General $37,934 41
2022 General $41,537 41
2021 General $25,107 23
2020 General $18,398 13
2019 General $46,024 49
2019 Research $2,081 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michelle Betz
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michelle Betz were reported at $48,056. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Michelle Betz Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $46,024 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $18,398 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $25,107 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $41,537 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $37,934 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $33,314 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $48,056 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biogen, Inc. $116,728 103 payments
  2. Horizon Therapeutics plc $41,368 44 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $39,026 29 payments
  4. Genentech USA, Inc. $29,540 37 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $16,464 21 payments
  6. EMD Serono, Inc. $5,695 6 payments
  7. Allergan Inc. $1,189 3 payments
  8. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $131 2 payments
  9. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $106 1 payment
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $66 1 payment
  11. Other $57 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $180,544 82 payments
  2. Honoraria $29,740 13 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $21,568 18 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $12,128 46 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $6,381 87 payments
  6. Education $9 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UPLIZNA Uplizna $41,368 44 payments
  2. TYSABRI $32,366 28 payments
  3. UPLIZNA Inflammation/Rare Disease $29,126 25 payments
  4. OCREVUS $28,955 36 payments
  5. VUMERITY Neurology $23,357 20 payments
  6. PLEGRIDY $21,268 16 payments
  7. TECFIDERA $17,135 14 payments
  8. AUBAGIO $14,018 17 payments
  9. VUMERITY Neurology $11,673 12 payments
  10. Ocrevus Zunovo $9,850 15 payments
  11. Other $5,108 14 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EMD Serono, Inc. $2,081 14 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 18 drugs

Part D claims

575

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$658,048

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

23.1%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 34 $318,272
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 19 $108,964
Teriflunomide Generic 23 $88,123
Glatiramer Acetate Generic 20 $62,984
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 39 $44,547
Dalfampridine Er Dalfampridine Brand 19 $10,755
Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 11 $9,375
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 11 $7,858
Pregabalin Generic 47 $1,602
Levetiracetam Generic 60 $1,598

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 18 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 12 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$20,511

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

174

Average age 66

Services billed

411

130 women, 44 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 55%
Depression 34%
Diabetes 24%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Chronic kidney disease 13%
Osteoporosis 13%
COPD 10%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VUMERITY
  • Biogen, Inc. $10,288
$10,288 — —
OCREVUS
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $4,649
$4,649 — —
TYSABRI
  • Biogen, Inc. $225
$225 — —
ULTOMIRIS
  • Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $131
$131 — —
BRIUMVI
  • TG Therapeutics, Inc. $106
$106 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

262 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record