Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Micheal MacKen

Clinical Neurophysiology Chicago, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1336110550 CMS profile 105846

259 E Erie St Ste 1900, Chicago, IL 60611

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$555,032

753 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$309,449 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Micheal MacKen of Chicago, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $555,032 across 753 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $309,449 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Clinical Neurophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $133,992 179
2024 General $116,178 186
2023 General $82,956 99
2022 General $54,167 61
2021 General $32,982 46
2020 General $35,416 65
2019 General $99,341 117

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Micheal MacKen
  • Clinical Neurophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Micheal MacKen were reported at $133,992. Among 259 Clinical Neurophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $435 and the middle half received between $121 and $1,917.

Show as a table
Year Micheal MacKen Clinical Neurophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $99,341 $306 $88–$1,636 $163
2020 $35,416 $299 $85–$1,847 $114
2021 $32,982 $325 $96–$2,308 $132
2022 $54,167 $395 $106–$1,957 $149
2023 $82,956 $388 $120–$1,718 $160
2024 $116,178 $471 $137–$1,931 $164
2025 $133,992 $435 $121–$1,917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $187,671 291 payments
  2. LivaNova USA, Inc. $183,898 243 payments
  3. SK Life Science, Inc. $99,772 115 payments
  4. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $51,220 59 payments
  5. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $13,553 15 payments
  6. Greenwich Biosciences, Inc. $10,024 17 payments
  7. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,974 4 payments
  8. Ucb SA $2,938 3 payments
  9. Medtronic USA, Inc. $981 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $338,343 147 payments
  2. Honoraria $93,050 39 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $63,685 320 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $40,599 21 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $19,339 225 payments
  6. Education $17 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Fintepla $108,406 177 payments
  2. XCOPRI $89,941 95 payments
  3. VNS Therapy Cardiology/Vascular Diseases $73,233 101 payments
  4. Epidiolex $61,214 75 payments
  5. Briviact $50,959 70 payments
  6. VNS THERAPY SENTIVA MODEL 1000 GENERATOR Neurology $44,627 36 payments
  7. VNS THERAPY SENTIVA MODEL 1000 GENERATOR Cardiology/Vascular Diseases $42,769 43 payments
  8. VNS Therapy Neurology $17,600 53 payments
  9. APTIOM $13,553 15 payments
  10. Nayzilam $12,357 13 payments
  11. Other $21,160 35 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

2,288

Median for Neuropsychiatry: 88

Drug cost

$1,190,157

Median for Neuropsychiatry: $2,689

Branded share of claims

31.2%

Median for Neuropsychiatry: 16.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 166 $425,593
Xcopri Cenobamate Brand 115 $184,585
Fycompa Perampanel Brand 78 $151,499
Fintepla Fenfluramine Hcl Brand 11 $106,752
Nayzilam Midazolam Brand 51 $61,325
Keppra Levetiracetam Brand 28 $49,856
Lacosamide Generic 225 $45,224
Felbamate Generic 32 $28,024
Clobazam Generic 212 $25,341
Lamictal Lamotrigine Brand 15 $24,305

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,891 Part D prescribers listed as Neuropsychiatry; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$88,116

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

503

Average age 70

Services billed

1,134

267 women, 236 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Depression 35%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Diabetes 32%
Heart failure 27%
Atrial fibrillation 25%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Fintepla
$46,110 11 —
Epidiolex
$20,513 — —
XCOPRI
$13,740 115 —
Briviact
$8,290 166 —
Nayzilam
$1,000 51 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

753 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Neurophysiology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record