Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Wang

Dermatology Rochester, MN Medical Doctor

NPI 1053744912 CMS profile 1076725

200 1St St Sw, Rochester, MN 55905

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,882

225 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$67,886 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Michael Wang of Rochester, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,882 across 225 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $67,886 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 72nd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,194 54
2024 General $1,249 54
2023 General $959 48
2022 General $3,108 55
2021 General $246 11
2020 General $125 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Wang
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Wang were reported at $1,194. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Michael Wang Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $125 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $246 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $3,108 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $959 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $1,249 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,194 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,549 47 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,447 66 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $534 14 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $399 14 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $373 19 payments
  6. Incyte Corporation $289 13 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $222 8 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $185 9 payments
  9. NuVasive, Inc. $164 1 payment
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $157 7 payments
  11. Other $564 27 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,916 221 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,925 1 payment
  3. Education $42 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. COSENTYX Immunology $2,085 14 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $909 46 payments
  3. DUPIXENT $514 14 payments
  4. RINVOQ $428 19 payments
  5. COSENTYX Dermatology $379 28 payments
  6. CIBINQO $373 19 payments
  7. OPZELURA $289 13 payments
  8. TALTZ $245 10 payments
  9. SOTYKTU $222 8 payments
  10. LITFULO $194 8 payments
  11. Other $2,214 94 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

1,792

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$146,662

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

1.4%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Otezla Apremilast Brand 12 $59,324
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 13 $46,789
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 209 $9,482
Ketoconazole Generic 475 $8,060
Metronidazole Generic 60 $3,199
Mometasone Furoate Generic 159 $2,961
Tacrolimus Generic 29 $2,690
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 95 $2,517
Calcipotriene Generic 13 $1,879
Fluocinolone Acetonide Generic 28 $1,462

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 87 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$839,256

Of which drugs: $1,440

Medicare patients

2,464

Average age 77

Services billed

11,166

1,069 women, 1,395 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Cancer 19%
Osteoporosis 18%
Diabetes 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 34 121 $90

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $271
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $40
$310 13 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $237
$237 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $175
$175 — —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $94
$94 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $82
$82 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

225 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record