Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Sheehan

Dermatology Columbus, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1134388119 CMS profile 509674

360 Plaza Dr, Suite C, Columbus, IN 47201

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$296,672

637 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$2,952

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$82,806 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Michael Sheehan of Columbus, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $296,672 across 637 general payments and $2,952 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $82,806 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $85,107 156
2025 Research $2,952 1
2024 General $86,473 149
2023 General $43,633 108
2022 General $15,651 57
2021 General $18,704 45
2020 General $14,342 43
2019 General $32,763 79

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Sheehan
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Sheehan were reported at $85,107. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Michael Sheehan Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $32,763 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $14,342 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $18,704 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $15,651 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $43,633 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $86,473 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $85,107 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $103,561 183 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $85,376 82 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $38,950 44 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $32,592 59 payments
  5. Celgene Corporation $29,625 32 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $2,370 24 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $570 30 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $558 27 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $540 50 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $509 16 payments
  11. Other $2,021 90 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $260,602 88 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $16,365 39 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $12,620 503 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $6,992 5 payments
  5. Education $94 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $67,402 100 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $44,400 49 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $40,976 33 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Immunology $36,759 42 payments
  5. SKYRIZI Immunology $30,909 51 payments
  6. Otezla Dermatology $29,565 28 payments
  7. Otezla Inflammation $27,297 51 payments
  8. SKYRIZI Immunology $3,629 14 payments
  9. DUPIXENT Immunology $2,372 6 payments
  10. CIBINQO $2,156 19 payments
  11. Other $5,451 289 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $2,952 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

2,251

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$502,246

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

6.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 20 $197,317
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 36 $160,555
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 11 $74,089
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 316 $8,475
Fluorouracil Generic 91 $7,562
Tacrolimus Generic 61 $7,324
Acitretin Generic 14 $6,531
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 108 $5,538
Ketoconazole Generic 330 $5,138
Desoximetasone Generic 46 $4,541

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 53 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$211,008

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,443

Average age 76

Services billed

5,444

684 women, 759 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Cancer 17%
Depression 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $44,176
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $9,386
$53,563 36 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $18,589
$18,589 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $13,066
$13,066 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $253
$253 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $220
$220 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

638 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record