Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Roberts

Internal Medicine Niceville, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1972691368 CMS profile 316078

1001 College Blvd W Ste D, Niceville, FL 32578

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,088

783 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Roberts of Niceville, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,088 across 783 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,353 72
2024 General $2,075 115
2023 General $2,272 120
2022 General $1,991 118
2021 General $2,165 148
2020 General $1,800 117
2019 General $1,432 93

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Roberts
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Roberts were reported at $1,353. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Michael Roberts Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,432 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,800 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,165 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,991 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,272 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,075 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,353 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,299 85 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,163 82 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,123 80 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,098 55 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $956 66 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $733 38 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $715 36 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $498 33 payments
  9. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $490 25 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $454 36 payments
  11. Other $4,559 247 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,993 782 payments
  2. Education $95 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,252 81 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,154 76 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $714 37 payments
  4. FARXIGA $673 36 payments
  5. Repatha $540 38 payments
  6. BELSOMRA $473 31 payments
  7. VRAYLAR $471 35 payments
  8. UBRELVY $446 33 payments
  9. MYRBETRIQ $440 24 payments
  10. Otezla $428 33 payments
  11. Other $11,131 678 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 188 drugs

Part D claims

12,527

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,514,446

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 124 $200,624
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 203 $172,238
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 123 $164,272
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 70 $86,636
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 52 $66,132
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 50 $60,435
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 12 $59,397
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 47 $56,951
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 51 $52,092
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 12 $43,925

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 188 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$607,275

Of which drugs: $5,462

Medicare patients

924

Average age 76

Services billed

15,974

502 women, 422 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Diabetes 40%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Osteoporosis 28%
Heart failure 26%
Depression 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 57 57 $4,664
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 82 4,641 $468
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 32 43 $136
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 29 93 $25
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 12 27 $16

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RYBELSUS
$158 11 —
Ozempic
$158 124 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$155 51 —
VRAYLAR
$133 26 —
AIRSUPRA
$127 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

783 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record