Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Park

Ophthalmology New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1831611177 CMS profile 9304524

310 E 14Th St, New York, NY 10003

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,659

57 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Park of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,659 across 57 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 74th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $446 17
2024 General $644 26
2023 General $1,994 11
2022 General $450 2
2021 General $125 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Park
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Park were reported at $446. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Michael Park Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $0 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $125 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $450 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,994 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $644 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $446 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $2,134 8 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $493 18 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $213 11 payments
  4. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $186 10 payments
  5. Neurotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $158 1 payment
  6. Alcon Vision LLC $149 1 payment
  7. EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $125 1 payment
  8. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $100 1 payment
  9. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $37 2 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $19 1 payment
  11. Other $45 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,901 54 payments
  2. Honoraria $1,740 2 payments
  3. Education $17 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. ILUVIEN Ophthalmology $1,987 4 payments
  2. EYLEA HD $378 17 payments
  3. OZURDEX $213 11 payments
  4. Syfovre $186 10 payments
  5. YUTIQ Treatment of chronic non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye $166 5 payments
  6. ILUVIEN treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients who have been previously treated with corticosteroid $165 5 payments
  7. Clareon $149 1 payment
  8. YUTIQ Chronic Non-infectious Posterior Segment Uveitis $125 1 payment
  9. EYLEA $115 1 payment
  10. Tecnis Simplicity $100 1 payment
  11. Other $397 9 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

553

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$25,202

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

19.9%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prolensa Bromfenac Sodium Brand 25 $8,489
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 176 $6,576
Bromfenac Sodium Generic 22 $3,655
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 68 $1,963
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 41 $775
Ofloxacin Generic 54 $714
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 39 $683
Atropine Sulfate Generic 19 $638
Latanoprost Generic 48 $521
Acetazolamide Er Acetazolamide Brand 14 $501

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,227,897

Of which drugs: $807,112

Medicare patients

636

Average age 78

Services billed

9,110

366 women, 270 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 45%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Heart failure 23%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
Cancer 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 94 2,368 $625,874
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 23 94 $62,366
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 19 2,232 $60,986
Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg Q5128 Office 14 100 $18,370

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $229
$229 — 2,368
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $145
$145 — —
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $106
$106 — —
ILUVIEN
  • Alimera Sciences, Inc. $74
$74 — —
Cimerli
  • Sandoz Inc. $17
$17 — 100

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

57 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record