Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Lloyd

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Atlanta, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1992722821 CMS profile 846975

1364 Clifton Rd. Ne, Suite F424, Atlanta, GA 30322

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$221,390

369 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$222,346 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Michael Lloyd of Atlanta, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $221,390 across 369 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $222,346 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $27,913 43
2024 General $36,527 61
2023 General $47,767 76
2022 General $57,036 89
2021 General $8,491 23
2020 General $3,912 9
2019 General $39,744 68

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Lloyd
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Lloyd were reported at $27,913. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Michael Lloyd Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $39,744 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $3,912 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $8,491 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $57,036 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $47,767 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $36,527 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $27,913 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $106,681 143 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $48,045 90 payments
  3. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $39,354 60 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $11,104 56 payments
  5. Biosense Webster, Inc. $10,211 11 payments
  6. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $2,700 3 payments
  7. Circa Scientific, Inc. $2,476 1 payment
  8. Biotronik Inc. $719 2 payments
  9. Cardiva Medical, Inc. $54 2 payments
  10. CardioFocus, Inc. $45 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $115,949 44 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $58,183 22 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $34,576 136 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $8,482 161 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $4,200 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MICRA Pacemakers $31,905 51 payments
  2. Micra Pacemakers $28,759 68 payments
  3. CLINICAL TRIAL PRODUCT Clinical Trial Product $14,700 6 payments
  4. VersaCross Access Solution Icg $13,382 7 payments
  5. VersaCross Access Solution VersaCross Access Solution_ICG $12,601 11 payments
  6. CLINICAL TRIAL PRODUCT Clinical Trial Product_CRM $7,683 4 payments
  7. General - Therapies General - Therapies_CRM $5,215 17 payments
  8. General - Therapies General - Therapies_EP $4,688 3 payments
  9. LithoVue Empower $4,175 18 payments
  10. EMBLEM MRI S-ICD $3,652 6 payments
  11. Other $21,600 117 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

2,679

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$980,146

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

39.7%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 579 $664,835
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 190 $206,111
Dofetilide Generic 102 $32,685
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 17 $16,971
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 18 $14,354
Flecainide Acetate Generic 245 $11,301
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 11 $7,130
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 370 $5,075
Propafenone Hcl Er Propafenone Hcl Brand 20 $3,816
Nadolol Generic 33 $2,577

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 78 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$212,983

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

2,391

Average age 75

Services billed

5,390

1,043 women, 1,348 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 54%
Arthritis 44%
Ischemic heart disease 43%
Heart failure 41%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Diabetes 31%
Depression 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

369 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record