Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Lin

Dermatology Sherman Oaks, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1164436820 CMS profile 98087

15477 Ventura Blvd, Suite 100, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$27,745

801 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$725,213 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2023–2025

Through program year 2025, Michael Lin of Sherman Oaks, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $27,745 across 801 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $725,213 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,862 143
2024 General $6,155 182
2023 General $4,079 145
2022 General $2,305 119
2021 General $1,634 92
2020 General $719 33
2019 General $8,992 87

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Lin
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Lin were reported at $3,862. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Michael Lin Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $8,992 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $719 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,634 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,305 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $4,079 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $6,155 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,862 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Apyx Medical Corporation $6,998 1 payment
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $3,583 160 payments
  3. STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. $1,721 24 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $1,349 42 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,194 47 payments
  6. Organogenesis Inc. $1,192 25 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,060 32 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,040 59 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $1,038 45 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $950 35 payments
  11. Other $7,619 331 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,127 795 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $6,998 1 payment
  3. Honoraria $350 1 payment
  4. Education $266 3 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $5 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $1,960 81 payments
  2. XTRAC $1,721 24 payments
  3. DUPIXENT $1,489 47 payments
  4. TREMFYA $1,060 32 payments
  5. Otezla $1,024 44 payments
  6. XEPI $889 21 payments
  7. EUCRISA $776 65 payments
  8. TALTZ $743 35 payments
  9. RINVOQ $700 25 payments
  10. CIBINQO $673 58 payments
  11. Other $12,228 489 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

1,011

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$257,922

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

5.9%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 11 $102,141
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 13 $84,453
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 25 $49,001
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 173 $5,247
Fluorouracil Generic 47 $3,427
Tacrolimus Generic 12 $2,337
Calcipotriene Generic 11 $1,829
Tretinoin Generic 30 $1,465
Ketoconazole Generic 156 $1,450
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 37 $1,221

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 123 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$569,196

Of which drugs: $113,139

Medicare patients

611

Average age 73

Services billed

24,050

313 women, 298 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 50%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 20%
Heart failure 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 58 19,002 $25,322

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $473
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $28
$502 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $369
$369 — —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $359
$359 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $351
$351 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $347
$347 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

801 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record