Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Lim

Geriatric Medicine Arlington Heights, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1730294307 CMS profile 33728

1100 W Central Rd, Suite 301, Arlington Heights, IL 60005

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29,374

789 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Lim of Arlington Heights, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29,374 across 789 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Geriatric Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,585 105
2024 General $4,804 130
2023 General $3,230 97
2022 General $4,990 125
2021 General $4,749 122
2020 General $2,590 99
2019 General $4,427 111

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Lim
  • Geriatric Medicine median
  • Middle half of Geriatric Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Lim were reported at $4,585. Among 512 Geriatric Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $120 and the middle half received between $37 and $350.

Show as a table
Year Michael Lim Geriatric Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $4,427 $96 $28–$339 $163
2020 $2,590 $99 $28–$262 $114
2021 $4,749 $94 $27–$318 $132
2022 $4,990 $103 $34–$338 $149
2023 $3,230 $109 $39–$320 $160
2024 $4,804 $125 $36–$371 $164
2025 $4,585 $120 $37–$350 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $5,434 127 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $3,702 99 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $3,055 112 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,787 82 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $2,575 68 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,384 61 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $1,500 14 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $1,162 34 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $862 22 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $790 18 payments
  11. Other $5,122 152 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $29,349 785 payments
  2. Education $25 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JARDIANCE Diabetes $2,510 77 payments
  2. XARELTO $2,305 61 payments
  3. Ozempic $1,703 62 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $1,672 26 payments
  5. FARXIGA $1,496 41 payments
  6. MOUNJARO $1,359 44 payments
  7. Otezla $1,306 60 payments
  8. JARDIANCE Diabetes $1,214 54 payments
  9. Repatha $1,192 49 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $1,086 43 payments
  11. Other $17,461 551 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 52 drugs

Part D claims

2,136

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$264,979

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

21.2%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 28 $39,796
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 37 $35,987
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 24 $35,600
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 32 $29,474
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 26 $28,934
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 19 $22,402
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 15 $19,379
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 11 $12,932
Glyxambi Empagliflozin/Linagliptin Brand 13 $12,449
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 226 $3,291

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 52 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$132,974

Of which drugs: $7,317

Medicare patients

228

Average age 78

Services billed

2,253

116 women, 112 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Cancer 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 82 82 $6,709
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 16 16 $578

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $822
  • Lilly USA, LLC $174
$996 37 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $420
$420 26 —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $302
  • Lundbeck LLC $55
$357 11 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $336
$336 24 —
Korlym
  • Corcept Therapeutics $284
$284 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

789 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Geriatric Medicine in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record