Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Jardula

Internal Medicine Palm Springs, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1346222510 CMS profile 196394

275 N El Cielo, Palm Springs, CA 92262

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,239

296 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$52,248

Paid to them · 31 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,244,526 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Michael Jardula of Palm Springs, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,239 across 296 general payments and $52,248 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,244,526 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

12 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $391 17
2025 Research $95 1
2024 General $3,499 76
2024 Research $45,872 3
2023 General $2,250 44
2022 General $797 42
2022 Research $3,841 15
2021 General $591 27
2020 General $244 15
2020 Research $1,330 1
2019 General $2,468 75
2019 Research $1,110 11

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Jardula
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Jardula were reported at $391. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Michael Jardula Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,468 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $244 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $591 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $797 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,250 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,499 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $391 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $2,531 41 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk AS $1,231 4 payments
  3. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $1,162 9 payments
  4. ViiV Healthcare Company $855 32 payments
  5. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $642 21 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $450 21 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $398 23 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $301 16 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $264 17 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $228 12 payments
  11. Other $2,177 100 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,346 257 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $3,587 30 payments
  3. Education $306 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Tresiba $1,231 4 payments
  2. SYMTUZA $400 17 payments
  3. DOVATO $400 18 payments
  4. FARXIGA $275 16 payments
  5. Ozempic $271 14 payments
  6. XARELTO $230 15 payments
  7. APRETUDE $204 5 payments
  8. ENTRESTO $193 10 payments
  9. Repatha $193 8 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $188 10 payments
  11. Other $3,456 169 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $47,376 6 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk AS $3,841 15 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,030 10 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 237 drugs

Part D claims

19,299

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$5,046,975

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 252 $1,257,879
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 123 $556,116
Serostim Somatropin Brand 25 $514,468
Cabenuva Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 32 $210,093
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 165 $194,966
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 142 $177,448
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 116 $150,643
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 31 $144,222
Genvoya Elviteg/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alafen Brand 34 $140,341
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 89 $129,070

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 237 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DOVATO
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $222
$222 33 —
APRETUDE
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $121
$121 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $65
$65 165 —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $64
$64 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $56
$56 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

327 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record