Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Hancock

Internal Medicine Booneville, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1104236504 CMS profile 4217281

202 N 1St St, Booneville, MS 38829

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,516

229 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Hancock of Booneville, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,516 across 229 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $306 17
2024 General $455 20
2023 General $272 18
2022 General $558 39
2021 General $801 58
2020 General $600 38
2019 General $524 39

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Hancock
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Hancock were reported at $306. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Michael Hancock Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $524 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $600 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $801 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $558 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $272 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $455 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $306 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $552 44 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $502 36 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $336 27 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $322 16 payments
  5. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $202 14 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $160 11 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $154 11 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $134 8 payments
  9. CVRx, Inc. $132 1 payment
  10. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $116 8 payments
  11. Other $907 53 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,486 228 payments
  2. Education $30 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $493 39 payments
  2. Repatha $261 19 payments
  3. Otezla $215 16 payments
  4. ELIQUIS $198 16 payments
  5. Ozempic $194 14 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $194 14 payments
  7. Barostim Neo System $132 1 payment
  8. EVENITY $121 8 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $118 9 payments
  10. REXULTI $114 5 payments
  11. Other $2,599 170 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 244 drugs

Part D claims

19,631

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,773,871

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tetrabenazine Generic 13 $192,803
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 315 $183,646
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 155 $160,386
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 115 $124,070
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 151 $103,039
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 118 $90,241
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 125 $81,549
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 100 $71,397
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 64 $54,888
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 96 $46,216

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 244 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$111,103

Of which drugs: $3,035

Medicare patients

355

Average age 77

Services billed

3,614

213 women, 142 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Diabetes 40%
Depression 39%
COPD 38%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Heart failure 34%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 33 33 $2,618
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 43 204 $64
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 16 80 $39
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 59 300 $25

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $41
$41 100 —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $35
$35 27 —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $34
$34 64 —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $28
$28 — —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $27
$27 11 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

229 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record