Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Drury

Internal Medicine Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1568462893 CMS profile 162084

3815 E Bell Rd, Suite 4100, Phoenix, AZ 85032

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,625

717 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Drury of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,625 across 717 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,973 104
2024 General $2,357 142
2023 General $1,818 98
2022 General $1,608 83
2021 General $2,937 101
2020 General $1,042 64
2019 General $1,889 125

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Drury
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Drury were reported at $1,973. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Michael Drury Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,889 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,042 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,937 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,608 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,818 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,357 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,973 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,952 143 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,475 43 payments
  3. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,298 5 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $941 53 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $744 26 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $728 53 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $728 39 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $721 48 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $523 35 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $494 31 payments
  11. Other $4,022 241 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,051 707 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,200 1 payment
  3. Education $374 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $1,388 9 payments
  2. FARXIGA $1,195 26 payments
  3. VRAYLAR $846 72 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $803 45 payments
  5. XIFAXAN $721 48 payments
  6. LINZESS $701 43 payments
  7. CREON $567 34 payments
  8. AIRSUPRA $542 10 payments
  9. BREZTRI $432 8 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT Pain $391 24 payments
  11. Other $10,116 635 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 164 drugs

Part D claims

11,404

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$759,737

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

15.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 95 $120,828
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 52 $65,089
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 61 $61,480
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 44 $48,471
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 32 $47,481
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 49 $37,180
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 33 $35,121
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 30 $31,766
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 18 $19,967
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 23 $19,280

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 164 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 45 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$164,552

Of which drugs: $2,372

Medicare patients

513

Average age 75

Services billed

2,713

253 women, 260 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Diabetes 25%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
COPD 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 27 28 $2,271

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$437 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$190 33 —
XIFAXAN
$143 — —
BREZTRI
$131 19 —
AIRSUPRA
$119 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

717 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record