Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Carletti

Dermatology Fort Worth, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1013126390 CMS profile 790710

855 Montgomery St, Fort Worth, TX 76107

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$44,316

1,127 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$476 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2022

Through program year 2025, Michael Carletti of Fort Worth, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $44,316 across 1,127 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $476 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,545 213
2024 General $8,226 176
2023 General $7,528 212
2022 General $6,152 166
2021 General $3,960 127
2020 General $2,926 90
2019 General $4,978 143

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Carletti
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Carletti were reported at $10,545. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Michael Carletti Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,978 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $2,926 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $3,960 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $6,152 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $7,528 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $8,226 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $10,545 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $7,644 230 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $6,547 88 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,051 124 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $3,195 85 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $2,685 70 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $2,465 46 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $2,447 59 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $1,583 90 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,274 34 payments
  10. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $1,221 46 payments
  11. Other $11,205 255 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $39,864 1,109 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $3,488 2 payments
  3. Education $940 14 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $22 1 payment
  5. Travel and Lodging $3 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $7,415 84 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $2,908 91 payments
  3. HUMIRA $2,789 85 payments
  4. DUPIXENT $2,516 49 payments
  5. Otezla $2,369 53 payments
  6. RINVOQ $1,803 74 payments
  7. TALTZ $1,790 69 payments
  8. STELARA $1,761 48 payments
  9. COSENTYX $1,722 43 payments
  10. ILUMYA $1,657 43 payments
  11. Other $20,404 649 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

830

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,042,749

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

12.9%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 28 $596,113
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 25 $193,698
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 16 $108,985
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 26 $97,313
Vtama Tapinarof Brand 12 $17,450
Tacrolimus Generic 28 $5,293
Ketoconazole Generic 218 $5,211
Ciclopirox Generic 71 $4,259
Fluocinolone Acetonide Generic 63 $3,064
Tretinoin Generic 25 $2,525

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$670,614

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

293

Average age 75

Services billed

6,409

131 women, 162 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Diabetes 26%
Depression 26%
COPD 20%
Heart failure 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$2,090 — —
DUPIXENT
$742 26 —
COSENTYX
$576 25 —
ILUMYA
$528 — —
SKYRIZI
$491 28 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

1,127 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record