Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Brosman

Ophthalmology Wilmington, DE Medical Doctor

NPI 1720032832 CMS profile 32982

213 Greenhill Ave, Wilmington, DE 19805

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,588

225 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$18,000 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Michael Brosman of Wilmington, DE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,588 across 225 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $18,000 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $949 44
2024 General $1,005 42
2023 General $710 34
2022 General $836 44
2021 General $480 28
2020 General $229 12
2019 General $379 21

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Brosman
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Brosman were reported at $949. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Michael Brosman Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $379 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $229 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $480 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $836 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $710 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,005 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $949 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $669 27 payments
  2. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $637 27 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $515 29 payments
  4. Alcon Vision LLC $483 28 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $470 26 payments
  6. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $254 11 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $146 5 payments
  8. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $136 8 payments
  9. TissueTech, Inc. $126 6 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $112 5 payments
  11. Other $1,041 53 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,527 222 payments
  2. Gift $39 2 payments
  3. Long term medical supply or device loan $22 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XIIDRA $683 31 payments
  2. Cequa $627 25 payments
  3. MIEBO $306 11 payments
  4. EYLEA HD $290 14 payments
  5. XDEMVY $254 11 payments
  6. VYZULTA $199 10 payments
  7. EYLEA $180 12 payments
  8. PROLENSA $126 7 payments
  9. LUMIGAN $116 4 payments
  10. ACTHAR $112 5 payments
  11. Other $2,373 124 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

3,301

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$889,965

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

51.7%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 239 $318,792
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 120 $159,962
Cequa Cyclosporine Brand 71 $83,289
Prolensa Bromfenac Sodium Brand 181 $62,744
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 117 $53,835
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 64 $32,393
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 22 $17,477
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 452 $17,410
Restasis Multidose Cyclosporine Brand 19 $15,766
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 18 $14,698

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$351,048

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,547

Average age 75

Services billed

4,971

932 women, 615 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 35%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 18%
Cancer 16%
Atrial fibrillation 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIIDRA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $172
$172 239 —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $119
$119 18 —
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $112
$112 71 —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $100
$100 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $98
$98 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

225 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Delaware

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record