Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Brenner

Family Medicine South Sioux City, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1114992674 CMS profile 5152

3250 Plaza Dr, South Sioux City, NE 68776

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,140

971 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Brenner of South Sioux City, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,140 across 971 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,498 124
2024 General $6,418 154
2023 General $2,063 160
2022 General $1,665 150
2021 General $1,791 154
2020 General $1,265 100
2019 General $1,440 129

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Brenner
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Brenner were reported at $2,498. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Michael Brenner Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,440 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,265 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,791 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,665 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,063 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $6,418 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,498 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,620 16 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,649 61 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,168 90 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,156 95 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,098 128 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,069 86 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $880 101 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $751 92 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $574 43 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $509 27 payments
  11. Other $3,667 232 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,527 960 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $4,418 5 payments
  3. Education $195 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VOQUEZNA $4,568 11 payments
  2. FARXIGA $1,078 31 payments
  3. Ozempic $808 65 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $671 55 payments
  5. ELIQUIS $612 43 payments
  6. Repatha $582 78 payments
  7. Kerendia $509 27 payments
  8. UBRELVY $470 40 payments
  9. EVENITY $465 48 payments
  10. Otezla $451 49 payments
  11. Other $11,672 948 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 124 drugs

Part D claims

6,415

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$664,542

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

21.4%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 131 $115,477
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 73 $79,680
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 50 $72,815
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 49 $56,755
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 24 $45,254
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 62 $40,056
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 36 $33,404
Xultophy 100-3.6 Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide Brand 37 $32,034
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $25,121
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 29 $16,319

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 124 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 86 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$109,547

Of which drugs: $45,060

Medicare patients

268

Average age 73

Services billed

6,089

131 women, 137 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 34%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
COPD 19%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 18 1,740 $35,299
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 19 19 $5,550
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 65 65 $1,380

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VOQUEZNA
$3,992 — —
ZENPEP
$256 13 —
FARXIGA
$223 49 —
ELIQUIS
$149 131 —
VRAYLAR
$119 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

971 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record