Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mia Scott

Family Medicine Denver, CO Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1215019724 CMS profile 190753

300 S Jackson St, #100, Denver, CO 80209

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$53,187

543 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$940,162 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Mia Scott of Denver, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $53,187 across 543 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $940,162 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,605 49
2024 General $1,578 43
2023 General $2,068 61
2022 General $18,449 89
2021 General $15,283 65
2020 General $4,219 80
2019 General $9,984 156

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mia Scott
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mia Scott were reported at $1,605. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Mia Scott Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $9,984 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $4,219 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $15,283 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $18,449 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,068 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,578 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,605 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ViiV Healthcare Company $36,698 163 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $9,282 185 payments
  3. Theratechnologies Inc. $3,560 9 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $949 48 payments
  5. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $466 8 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $403 30 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $268 17 payments
  8. Amarin Pharma Inc. $222 6 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $211 9 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $193 10 payments
  11. Other $936 58 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $24,740 7 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $14,032 518 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $12,125 5 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,492 10 payments
  5. Honoraria $750 1 payment
  6. Education $47 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CABENUVA $12,731 13 payments
  2. DOVATO $9,443 100 payments
  3. TROGARZO $972 7 payments
  4. APRETUDE $639 19 payments
  5. PIFELTRO $626 30 payments
  6. DELSTRIGO $624 30 payments
  7. SYMTUZA $610 11 payments
  8. RUKOBIA $506 12 payments
  9. ISENTRESS $357 18 payments
  10. Biktarvy $312 4 payments
  11. Other $3,493 189 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 56 drugs

Part D claims

1,530

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,850,021

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

54.6%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 151 $597,255
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 101 $246,081
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 77 $217,224
Rukobia Fostemsavir Tromethamine Brand 22 $187,232
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 85 $182,398
Pifeltro Doravirine Brand 59 $101,517
Genvoya Elviteg/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alafen Brand 19 $75,070
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 19 $64,824
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 12 $42,829
Prezista Darunavir Brand 11 $39,588

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 56 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$13,907

Of which drugs: $602

Medicare patients

29

Average age 65

Services billed

195

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Alzheimer's or dementia 0%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DOVATO
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $358
$358 77 —
DELSTRIGO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $107
$107 — —
APRETUDE
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $80
$80 — —
RUKOBIA
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $33
$33 22 —
CABENUVA
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $29
$29 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

543 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record