Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Melody Burt

Family Medicine Punta Gorda, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1487638706 CMS profile 203863

315 E Olympia Ave Unit 223, Punta Gorda, FL 33950

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,527

567 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Melody Burt of Punta Gorda, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,527 across 567 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,834 74
2024 General $1,513 64
2023 General $1,866 90
2022 General $1,421 83
2021 General $1,806 109
2020 General $1,128 76
2019 General $960 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Melody Burt
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Melody Burt were reported at $1,834. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Melody Burt Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $960 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,128 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,806 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,421 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,866 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,513 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,834 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,295 79 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $1,183 64 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $936 47 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $748 41 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $729 22 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $684 47 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $649 48 payments
  8. Boston Scientific Corporation $612 14 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $563 28 payments
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $223 14 payments
  11. Other $2,905 163 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,108 558 payments
  2. Education $419 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $837 50 payments
  2. NURTEC ODT Pain $721 36 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $650 45 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $547 38 payments
  5. GARDASIL 9 $482 23 payments
  6. ZAVZPRET $431 23 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $369 24 payments
  8. WATCHMAN FLX $367 8 payments
  9. UBRELVY $361 17 payments
  10. PNEUMOVAX 23 $350 19 payments
  11. Other $9,572 549 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 172 drugs

Part D claims

14,738

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,355,876

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

18.9%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 126 $214,707
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 118 $198,758
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 167 $187,121
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 64 $133,196
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 75 $89,123
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 48 $54,083
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 62 $52,151
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 37 $49,159
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 13 $35,482
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 48 $35,321

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 172 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 136 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$472,294

Of which drugs: $40,428

Medicare patients

733

Average age 76

Services billed

31,708

489 women, 244 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 48%
Depression 35%
Heart failure 30%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Diabetes 24%
COPD 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 11 1,141 $23,351
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 146 146 $11,896
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 118 12,923 $1,290
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 50 57 $377
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 119 1,212 $105
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 37 220 $75
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 11 48 $38

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $156
$156 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $118
$118 — —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $110
$110 — —
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $47
$47 167 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $44
$44 62 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

567 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record