Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Melissa Moore

Neurology Tampa, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1962865410 CMS profile 5704132

13330 Usf Laurel Dr, Tampa, FL 33612

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,628

146 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$259,930 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2023–2025

Through program year 2025, Melissa Moore of Tampa, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,628 across 146 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $259,930 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $18,540 68
2024 General $5,838 43
2023 General $905 22
2022 General $218 7
2021 General $126 6

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Melissa Moore
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Melissa Moore were reported at $18,540. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Melissa Moore Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $0 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $126 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $218 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $905 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $5,838 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $18,540 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $17,384 16 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $5,271 35 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,649 61 payments
  4. Ipsen Innovation $515 4 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $167 3 payments
  6. Lundbeck LLC $143 6 payments
  7. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $142 2 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $118 6 payments
  9. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $65 3 payments
  10. Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $58 3 payments
  11. Other $115 7 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Honoraria $16,101 3 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $4,675 2 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $3,848 136 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,004 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Symbravo $17,313 15 payments
  2. ZAVZPRET $5,271 35 payments
  3. UBRELVY $1,055 39 payments
  4. QULIPTA $841 38 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $520 32 payments
  6. DYSPORT $515 4 payments
  7. AIMOVIG $167 3 payments
  8. BOTOX $146 7 payments
  9. VYEPTI $143 6 payments
  10. AJOVY $142 2 payments
  11. Other $573 25 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

1,746

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$835,601

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

51%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 128 $195,099
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 135 $179,170
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 97 $128,533
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 137 $118,639
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 126 $102,588
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 38 $49,436
Emgality Syringe Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 24 $25,077
Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 11 $12,084
Sumatriptan Succinate Generic 81 $3,987
Carbamazepine Er Carbamazepine Brand 23 $2,732

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$221,889

Of which drugs: $184,440

Medicare patients

149

Average age 66

Services billed

38,024

112 women, 37 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 68%
Depression 50%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
COPD 25%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Osteoporosis 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 65 37,600 $184,432

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $4,855
$4,855 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $367
$367 128 —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $152
$152 38 37,600
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $130
$130 97 —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $103
$103 135 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

146 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record