Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Melissa James

Physician Assistant Lone Tree, CO Physician Assistant

NPI 1003167966 CMS profile 11004162

10107 Ridgegate Pkwy Ste 120, Lone Tree, CO 80124

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,477

79 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Melissa James of Lone Tree, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,477 across 79 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $494 13
2024 General $948 22
2023 General $619 16
2022 General $768 14
2021 General $648 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Melissa James
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Melissa James were reported at $494. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Melissa James Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $648 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $768 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $619 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $948 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $494 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $856 14 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $820 19 payments
  3. Genmab U.S., Inc. $626 15 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $306 9 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $198 4 payments
  6. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $165 2 payments
  7. Tempus AI, Inc $142 2 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $112 1 payment
  9. Eisai Inc. $77 4 payments
  10. Hologic, LLC $69 3 payments
  11. Other $107 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,377 78 payments
  2. Education $100 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TIVDAK $626 15 payments
  2. LYNPARZA $603 14 payments
  3. ZEJULA Oncology $392 5 payments
  4. ZEJULA Oncology $302 5 payments
  5. KEYTRUDA $270 7 payments
  6. ELAHERE $198 4 payments
  7. ENHERTU $121 1 payment
  8. Veozah $112 1 payment
  9. JEMPERLI $81 3 payments
  10. Lenvima $77 4 payments
  11. Other $293 12 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

79 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record