Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mehul Desai

Pain Medicine Washington, DC Medical Doctor

NPI 1114045341 CMS profile 322938

2141 K St Nw, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20037

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$339,070

737 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$7,061

Paid to them · 12 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$101,820

6 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,038,289 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Mehul Desai of Washington, DC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $339,070 across 737 general payments and $7,061 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,038,289 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $101,820 across 6 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

16 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $43,403 82
2024 General $47,270 78
2023 General $96,080 145
2023 Research $1,161 2
2022 General $78,564 93
2022 Research $4,700 6
2021 General $38,675 130
2021 Research $1,200 4
2020 General $12,677 78
2019 General $22,400 131
2025 Ownership $18,210 1
2024 Ownership $18,210 1
2023 Ownership $18,210 1
2022 Ownership $18,210 1
2021 Ownership $18,210 1
2020 Ownership $10,770 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mehul Desai
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mehul Desai were reported at $43,403. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Mehul Desai Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $22,400 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $12,677 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $38,675 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $78,564 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $96,080 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $47,270 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $43,403 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nalu Medical, Inc. $184,008 167 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $44,264 116 payments
  3. Avanos Medical $39,075 42 payments
  4. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $22,116 36 payments
  5. The Institute of Musculoskeletal Science and Education $11,150 2 payments
  6. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $9,905 28 payments
  7. Interventional Pain Technologies Inc. $9,338 7 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $6,434 148 payments
  9. Medtronic USA, Inc. $4,723 39 payments
  10. MML US, Inc. $1,571 19 payments
  11. Other $6,487 133 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $223,867 69 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $35,394 13 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $28,470 580 payments
  4. Honoraria $26,755 10 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $23,966 63 payments
  6. Entertainment $617 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nalu Neurostimulation System $184,008 167 payments
  2. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $37,134 73 payments
  3. COOLIEF $30,601 15 payments
  4. SPRINT PNS System $22,116 36 payments
  5. Intracept Pain $9,684 24 payments
  6. Intracept Pain $9,684 24 payments
  7. Vyrsa V1 $8,750 3 payments
  8. COOLIEF* COOLED RADIOFREQUENCY $5,099 14 payments
  9. GENERATOR $3,375 13 payments
  10. INTELLIS $1,642 19 payments
  11. Other $19,696 362 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bioventus LLC $5,581 7 payments
  2. Nevro Corp. $1,480 5 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

175

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 276

Drug cost

$2,511

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $5,921

Branded share of claims

17.1%

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 11.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 62 $814
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 21 $518
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 19 $388
Baclofen Generic 18 $276
Cephalexin Generic 13 $203
Gabapentin Generic 20 $119
Hydromorphone Hcl Generic 11 $101
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 11 $91

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,591 Part D prescribers listed as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 70 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$351,045

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

569

Average age 73

Services billed

2,642

356 women, 213 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 70%
Depression 30%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Osteoporosis 26%
Diabetes 23%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Cancer 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

749 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record