Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Meena Singh

Dermatology Overland Park, KS Medical Doctor

NPI 1275700528 CMS profile 148157

11520 West 119Th Street, Overland Park, KS 66213

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$180,948

856 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$25,800 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2023

Through program year 2025, Meena Singh of Overland Park, KS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $180,948 across 856 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $25,800 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $78,891 196
2024 General $37,234 145
2023 General $57,631 168
2022 General $3,425 112
2021 General $1,079 65
2020 General $865 51
2019 General $1,823 119

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Meena Singh
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Meena Singh were reported at $78,891. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Meena Singh Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,823 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $865 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,079 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $3,425 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $57,631 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $37,234 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $78,891 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $83,158 129 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $47,422 95 payments
  3. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $21,133 65 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $16,769 151 payments
  5. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $5,100 36 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $706 34 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $649 34 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $586 32 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $537 32 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $514 27 payments
  11. Other $4,375 221 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $110,219 38 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $27,354 16 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $21,774 39 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $16,031 759 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $5,415 1 payment
  6. Education $156 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LITFULO $72,773 76 payments
  2. OLUMIANT $41,033 49 payments
  3. Leqselvi $20,374 33 payments
  4. CIBINQO $9,492 80 payments
  5. Zoryve $4,899 30 payments
  6. RINVOQ $3,498 48 payments
  7. SKYRIZI Immunology $3,459 16 payments
  8. BOTOX $3,292 10 payments
  9. EUCRISA $1,630 61 payments
  10. SKYRIZI Immunology $1,069 61 payments
  11. Other $10,795 572 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 18 drugs

Part D claims

1,905

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$28,148

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

3.7%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dutasteride Generic 375 $10,302
Minoxidil Generic 785 $7,043
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 164 $2,535
Finasteride Generic 157 $1,664
Gentamicin Sulfate Generic 34 $1,339
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 31 $1,271
Fluocinolone Acetonide Fluocinolone/Shower Cap Brand 32 $1,099
Spironolactone Generic 67 $545
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 19 $388
Ciprofloxacin Hcl Generic 77 $385

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 18 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$340,615

Of which drugs: $39,593

Medicare patients

469

Average age 74

Services billed

2,219

306 women, 163 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 64%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Osteoporosis 21%
Cancer 18%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Kerecis omega3, per square centimeter Q4158 Office 19 273 $38,872
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 70 137 $100

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LITFULO
  • PFIZER INC. $20,179
$20,179 — —
OLUMIANT
  • Lilly USA, LLC $12,692
$12,692 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $2,188
$2,188 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $247
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $18
$265 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $248
$248 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

856 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Kansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record