Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Meagen McCusker

Dermatology Enfield, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1861651432 CMS profile 311377

113 Elm Street, Suite 304, Enfield, CT 06082

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,818,460

2,798 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Meagen McCusker of Enfield, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,818,460 across 2,798 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $519,573 650
2024 General $413,064 565
2023 General $326,261 535
2022 General $266,278 435
2021 General $102,855 223
2020 General $61,234 151
2019 General $129,195 239

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Meagen McCusker
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Meagen McCusker were reported at $519,573. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Meagen McCusker Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $129,195 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $61,234 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $102,855 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $266,278 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $326,261 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $413,064 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $519,573 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $570,365 637 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $282,980 191 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $259,144 227 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $182,256 157 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $116,112 158 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $103,777 164 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $87,119 259 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $53,573 91 payments
  9. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $42,306 100 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $27,721 151 payments
  11. Other $93,107 663 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,302,120 415 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $233,174 77 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $206,563 333 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $66,028 1,962 payments
  5. Honoraria $10,200 3 payments
  6. Education $375 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $389,939 249 payments
  2. RINVOQ $274,943 284 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $218,919 202 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $162,912 229 payments
  5. Otezla $162,664 143 payments
  6. EBGLYSS $87,236 95 payments
  7. Bimzelx $84,615 126 payments
  8. CIBINQO $77,923 104 payments
  9. HUMIRA $63,421 99 payments
  10. OPZELURA $48,840 86 payments
  11. Other $277,743 1,435 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 42 drugs

Part D claims

1,433

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,268,916

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

24.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 47 $377,665
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 75 $281,324
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 22 $161,378
Humira Adalimumab Brand 11 $146,202
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 21 $99,918
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 12 $87,151
Adbry Tralokinumab-Ldrm Brand 11 $65,656
Jublia Efinaconazole Brand 13 $11,330
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 16 $7,777
Fluorouracil Generic 111 $6,524

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 42 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 72 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$252,146

Of which drugs: $101,068

Medicare patients

631

Average age 76

Services billed

6,502

399 women, 232 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Diabetes 20%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Depression 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 13 3,000 $4,011

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$84,972 47 —
DUPIXENT
$73,798 96 —
Otezla
$56,617 — —
SKYRIZI
$44,073 — —
CIBINQO
$30,010 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

2,798 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record