Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mazen Khusayem

Internal Medicine Clayton, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1285604934 CMS profile 103815

301 Amos St, Clayton, NC 27520

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$24,494

949 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mazen Khusayem of Clayton, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $24,494 across 949 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,366 101
2024 General $2,189 94
2023 General $3,455 150
2022 General $4,088 172
2021 General $6,255 169
2020 General $2,791 136
2019 General $3,351 127

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mazen Khusayem
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mazen Khusayem were reported at $2,366. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Mazen Khusayem Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,351 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,791 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $6,255 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $4,088 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,455 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,189 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,366 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $5,062 149 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,868 110 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,658 72 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,595 64 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,509 84 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $801 24 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $780 37 payments
  8. Merz North America, Inc. $722 10 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $715 47 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $714 27 payments
  11. Other $7,070 325 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,047 927 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $2,315 4 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $479 6 payments
  4. Education $402 11 payments
  5. Honoraria $250 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $2,913 76 payments
  2. FARXIGA $2,150 61 payments
  3. Ozempic $1,742 94 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,144 58 payments
  5. BREZTRI $902 13 payments
  6. Repatha $816 43 payments
  7. Wegovy $814 26 payments
  8. MOUNJARO $783 34 payments
  9. Otezla $690 49 payments
  10. XARELTO $646 24 payments
  11. Other $17,213 794 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 192 drugs

Part D claims

15,612

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,343,309

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 181 $248,316
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 142 $118,809
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 93 $93,068
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 54 $70,913
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 57 $61,891
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 55 $50,216
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 37 $47,680
Janumet Xr Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 50 $43,040
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 24 $42,712
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 17 $41,911

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 192 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$168,495

Of which drugs: $280

Medicare patients

365

Average age 76

Services billed

3,404

197 women, 168 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 70%
Arthritis 50%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
COPD 27%
Depression 26%
Heart failure 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 48 238 $160
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 15 58 $53
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 34 84 $42
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 12 17 $2

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 42 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$342 — —
MOUNJARO
$208 31 —
Wegovy
$204 — —
Xeomin
$134 — —
JARDIANCE
$108 54 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 42 with Patron

Records

949 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record