Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mauricio Waintrub

Internal Medicine Aurora, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1417900200 CMS profile 109098

1360 S Potomac St, Aurora, CO 80012

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,464

422 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$913

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,269,185 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2025

Through program year 2025, Mauricio Waintrub of Aurora, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,464 across 422 general payments and $913 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,269,185 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,775 105
2024 General $2,152 66
2024 Research $913 1
2023 General $566 31
2022 General $870 57
2021 General $896 47
2020 General $658 39
2019 General $1,546 77

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mauricio Waintrub
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mauricio Waintrub were reported at $2,775. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Mauricio Waintrub Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,546 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $658 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $896 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $870 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $566 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,152 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,775 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,603 54 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $916 38 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $808 46 payments
  4. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $638 17 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $546 33 payments
  6. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $525 25 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $347 14 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $330 18 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $291 17 payments
  10. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $287 9 payments
  11. Other $3,174 151 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,464 422 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $801 24 payments
  2. ENTRESTO $471 29 payments
  3. REPATHA $454 24 payments
  4. AIRSUPRA $453 8 payments
  5. XARELTO $407 24 payments
  6. UBRELVY $377 16 payments
  7. EVENITY $320 6 payments
  8. Epclusa $314 3 payments
  9. REXULTI $287 9 payments
  10. Otezla $267 24 payments
  11. Other $7,414 405 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $913 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 180 drugs

Part D claims

11,523

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,063,744

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 143 $153,170
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 98 $150,268
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 300 $130,298
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 28 $53,010
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 67 $47,939
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 12 $43,166
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 23 $42,832
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 38 $39,529
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 62 $36,351
Spiriva Handihaler Tiotropium Bromide Brand 29 $18,575

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 180 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 116 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$360,644

Of which drugs: $1,211

Medicare patients

643

Average age 74

Services billed

7,420

349 women, 294 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Chronic kidney disease 43%
Depression 38%
Diabetes 36%
COPD 26%
Heart failure 25%
Ischemic heart disease 25%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Epclusa
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $243
$243 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $227
$227 143 —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $152
$152 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $139
$139 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $122
$122 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

423 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record