Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthews Gwynn

Neurology Atlanta, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1225112667 CMS profile 236634

990 Hammond Dr Ste 325, Atlanta, GA 30328

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$33,281

1,061 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$742,151 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Matthews Gwynn of Atlanta, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $33,281 across 1,061 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $742,151 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,288 153
2024 General $3,424 165
2023 General $3,297 157
2022 General $3,104 169
2021 General $4,157 150
2020 General $12,919 131
2019 General $3,092 136

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthews Gwynn
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthews Gwynn were reported at $3,288. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Matthews Gwynn Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,092 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $12,919 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $4,157 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $3,104 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $3,297 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $3,424 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $3,288 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Allergan Inc. $13,633 70 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $3,589 223 payments
  3. Biogen, Inc. $1,249 55 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,156 48 payments
  5. Lundbeck LLC $945 44 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $849 41 payments
  7. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $750 32 payments
  8. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $705 34 payments
  9. Neurelis, Inc. $625 25 payments
  10. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $562 44 payments
  11. Other $9,218 445 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,827 1,047 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $11,434 7 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,006 4 payments
  4. Education $13 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY Neuroscience $11,285 43 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $2,803 91 payments
  3. QULIPTA $1,849 119 payments
  4. AIMOVIG $956 46 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $882 48 payments
  6. TYSABRI $831 36 payments
  7. Briviact $827 35 payments
  8. BOTOX $720 28 payments
  9. VYEPTI $709 33 payments
  10. VALTOCO $625 25 payments
  11. Other $14,723 732 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

519

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$76,874

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

31.6%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 48 $62,659
Levetiracetam Generic 36 $2,516
Carbamazepine Er Carbamazepine Brand 16 $2,330
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 36 $1,402
Propranolol Hcl Er Propranolol Hcl Brand 25 $1,288
Sumatriptan Succinate Generic 36 $1,175
Carbamazepine Generic 14 $1,084
Memantine Hcl Generic 22 $903
Gabapentin Generic 45 $698
Phenobarbital Generic 15 $391

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$249,845

Of which drugs: $122,763

Medicare patients

418

Average age 76

Services billed

25,366

242 women, 176 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 57%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Depression 24%
Diabetes 23%
Osteoporosis 22%
Cancer 19%
Alzheimer's or dementia 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 42 21,552 $105,715

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 35 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$460 — —
VYEPTI
$306 — —
BOTOX
$274 48 21,552
Leqembi
$237 — —
UBRELVY
$201 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 35 with Patron

Records

1,061 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record