Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Woods

Dermatology Gilbert, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1437276276 CMS profile 65356

1688 E. Boston St.,, Suite 101, Gilbert, AZ 85295

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,589

707 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Matthew Woods of Gilbert, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,589 across 707 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,626 90
2024 General $2,710 134
2023 General $2,173 116
2022 General $2,057 107
2021 General $1,390 80
2020 General $1,891 63
2019 General $4,742 117

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Woods
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Woods were reported at $1,626. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Woods Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,742 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $1,891 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,390 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,057 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $2,173 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,710 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,626 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $4,297 51 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,975 105 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,453 52 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,227 71 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,130 73 payments
  6. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $809 56 payments
  7. LEO Pharma Inc. $666 37 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $558 35 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $512 25 payments
  10. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $430 33 payments
  11. Other $3,532 169 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,953 702 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $3,450 2 payments
  3. Education $187 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EUCRISA $4,208 46 payments
  2. DUPIXENT $1,043 35 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $992 54 payments
  4. TREMFYA $924 47 payments
  5. HUMIRA $629 34 payments
  6. OPZELURA $558 35 payments
  7. COSENTYX $498 30 payments
  8. RINVOQ $478 23 payments
  9. CIBINQO $445 26 payments
  10. ADBRY $425 23 payments
  11. Other $9,511 539 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

700

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$17,660

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

7.9%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Targadox Doxycycline Hyclate Brand 11 $5,115
Tacrolimus Generic 19 $2,015
Ketoconazole Generic 79 $1,280
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 187 $1,239
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 36 $1,136
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 22 $810
Tretinoin Generic 15 $775
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 40 $715
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 15 $658
Spironolactone Generic 21 $612

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 93 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$491,870

Of which drugs: $32,828

Medicare patients

1,664

Average age 74

Services billed

10,249

884 women, 780 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Diabetes 20%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Depression 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 62 108 $32,772
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 51 74 $54

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$404 — —
TREMFYA
$333 — —
SKYRIZI
$319 — —
Zoryve
$238 — —
COSENTYX
$215 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

707 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record