Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Stevens

Family Medicine Tulsa, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1245201086 CMS profile 192444

10507 E 91St St, Suite 550, Tulsa, OK 74133

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,130

1,014 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Matthew Stevens of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,130 across 1,014 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,549 85
2024 General $2,084 127
2023 General $2,200 147
2022 General $2,630 183
2021 General $2,840 198
2020 General $2,074 145
2019 General $1,754 129

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Stevens
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Stevens were reported at $1,549. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Stevens Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,754 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,074 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,840 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,630 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,200 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,084 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,549 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,753 123 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,543 127 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,527 113 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,511 85 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $1,296 94 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $980 65 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $899 55 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $820 42 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $794 54 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $517 41 payments
  11. Other $3,491 215 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,130 1,014 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,056 78 payments
  2. FARXIGA $963 50 payments
  3. TRINTELLIX $718 36 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $640 47 payments
  5. Ozempic $626 39 payments
  6. EMGALITY $621 49 payments
  7. UBRELVY $615 38 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $575 36 payments
  9. XARELTO $540 36 payments
  10. JARDIANCE Diabetes $493 33 payments
  11. Other $13,961 976 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 74 drugs

Part D claims

2,434

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$217,067

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

20.6%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 40 $40,112
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 34 $39,319
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 24 $32,417
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 13 $21,141
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 17 $14,508
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 25 $10,553
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 12 $10,012
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 13 $7,852
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 194 $5,073
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 42 $3,208

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 74 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$20,704

Of which drugs: $3,730

Medicare patients

126

Average age 76

Services billed

712

56 women, 70 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 40%
Diabetes 27%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Cancer 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Osteoporosis 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 31 31 $2,536

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$165 — —
SPRAVATO
$113 — —
JARDIANCE
$84 34 —
FARXIGA
$84 — —
Wegovy
$83 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,014 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record