Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Meier

Internal Medicine O Fallon, MO Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1578574372 CMS profile 252250

1002 Peruque Crossing Ct, Suite 102, O Fallon, MO 63366

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,798

439 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Matthew Meier of O Fallon, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,798 across 439 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,179 40
2024 General $1,434 45
2023 General $1,986 53
2022 General $1,642 70
2021 General $1,759 89
2020 General $1,382 77
2019 General $1,415 65

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Meier
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Meier were reported at $1,179. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Meier Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,415 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,382 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,759 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,642 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,986 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,434 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,179 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,518 59 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,435 74 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,279 59 payments
  4. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $510 22 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $484 11 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $451 26 payments
  7. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. $414 5 payments
  8. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $409 6 payments
  9. Nevro Corp. $333 3 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $323 4 payments
  11. Other $3,642 170 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,789 437 payments
  2. Education $9 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $898 31 payments
  2. Ozempic $859 56 payments
  3. FARXIGA $682 30 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $644 41 payments
  5. FANAPT $414 5 payments
  6. BREZTRI $411 14 payments
  7. VOQUEZNA $380 4 payments
  8. XARELTO $372 19 payments
  9. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $346 19 payments
  10. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $324 10 payments
  11. Other $7,449 350 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 113 drugs

Part D claims

6,022

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$675,467

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 109 $139,110
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 93 $83,306
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 67 $60,656
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 46 $52,260
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 48 $47,038
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 49 $36,833
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 35 $34,646
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 31 $31,940
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 32 $23,853
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 26 $21,552

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 113 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$54,012

Of which drugs: $5,145

Medicare patients

158

Average age 74

Services billed

925

67 women, 91 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Diabetes 40%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Depression 26%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Cancer 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 47 47 $3,846

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $279
$279 — —
FANAPT
  • Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. $244
$244 — —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $90
  • PFIZER INC. $7
$98 93 —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $97
$97 — —
Xelstrym
  • Noven Therapeutics, LLC $94
$94 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

439 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record