Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Hoggatt

Urology Webster, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1285646471 CMS profile 330876

250 Blossom St, Suite 220, Webster, TX 77598

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$44,009

269 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Matthew Hoggatt of Webster, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $44,009 across 269 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Urology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,581 30
2024 General $8,465 50
2023 General $3,625 44
2022 General $5,987 49
2021 General $1,860 34
2020 General $5,473 16
2019 General $8,017 46

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Hoggatt
  • Urology median
  • Middle half of Urology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Hoggatt were reported at $10,581. Among 9,461 Urology profiles paid that year, the median was $629 and the middle half received between $190 and $1,620.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Hoggatt Urology median Middle half National median
2019 $8,017 $480 $147–$1,201 $163
2020 $5,473 $246 $87–$645 $114
2021 $1,860 $358 $111–$1,000 $132
2022 $5,987 $476 $143–$1,263 $149
2023 $3,625 $560 $168–$1,461 $160
2024 $8,465 $563 $170–$1,464 $164
2025 $10,581 $629 $190–$1,620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $18,418 44 payments
  2. Astellas Pharma US Inc $9,548 62 payments
  3. Verathon Inc. $5,000 1 payment
  4. Urovant Sciences Inc $4,436 17 payments
  5. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $1,735 7 payments
  6. Boston Scientific Corporation $838 15 payments
  7. Teleflex LLC $366 6 payments
  8. NeoTract Inc. $364 4 payments
  9. Agiliti Surgical, Inc. $330 2 payments
  10. Olympus America Inc. $270 2 payments
  11. Other $2,704 109 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $25,891 15 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $7,371 234 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $5,770 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $4,892 13 payments
  5. Education $85 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GEMTESA $22,827 60 payments
  2. MYRBETRIQ $8,960 35 payments
  3. Da Vinci Surgical System $1,735 7 payments
  4. XTANDI $634 37 payments
  5. UROLIFT $500 6 payments
  6. Sonablate HIFU $330 2 payments
  7. ERLEADA $248 17 payments
  8. LUPRON DEPOT $231 10 payments
  9. ADSTILADRIN $187 7 payments
  10. Altis $183 3 payments
  11. Other $4,135 115 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

1,182

Median for Urology: 1,053

Drug cost

$185,979

Median for Urology: $101,464

Branded share of claims

37.8%

Median for Urology: 27.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 83 $85,238
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 90 $73,724
Potassium Citrate Er Potassium Citrate Brand 41 $5,025
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 279 $4,783
Silodosin Generic 47 $3,735
Solifenacin Succinate Generic 71 $2,958
Estradiol Generic 29 $2,500
Dutasteride Generic 54 $1,760
Trospium Chloride Generic 19 $1,322
Testosterone Cypionate Generic 21 $826

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,221 Part D prescribers listed as Urology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$148,650

Of which drugs: $9,291

Medicare patients

338

Average age 74

Services billed

3,242

83 women, 255 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 39%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Cancer 29%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Heart failure 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $6,175
$6,175 90 —
XTANDI
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $85
$85 — —
ADSTILADRIN
  • Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. $71
$71 — —
ERLEADA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $31
$31 — —
PYLARIFY
  • Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $29
$29 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

269 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Urology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record