Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Else

Family Medicine Tulsa, OK Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1265891212 CMS profile 4222729

5711 E 71St St Ste 100, Tulsa, OK 74136

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,667

531 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Matthew Else of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,667 across 531 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $708 23
2024 General $3,086 176
2023 General $2,315 124
2022 General $1,774 102
2021 General $1,010 42
2020 General $986 36
2019 General $788 28

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Else
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Else were reported at $708. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Else Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $788 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $986 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,010 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,774 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,315 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $3,086 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $708 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,643 57 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,329 83 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,028 85 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $975 31 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $857 42 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $518 36 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $436 15 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $419 27 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $404 15 payments
  10. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $369 6 payments
  11. Other $2,689 134 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,637 530 payments
  2. Education $30 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BREZTRI $798 23 payments
  2. FARXIGA $736 22 payments
  3. EVENITY $584 17 payments
  4. VRAYLAR $483 46 payments
  5. Kerendia $419 27 payments
  6. AIRSUPRA $404 14 payments
  7. SPRAVATO $403 13 payments
  8. UBRELVY $334 20 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $325 19 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $313 14 payments
  11. Other $7,290 406 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 112 drugs

Part D claims

4,746

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$807,653

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

24.8%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 81 $111,162
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 83 $108,727
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 28 $65,441
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 14 $62,981
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 56 $58,867
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 62 $56,667
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 37 $54,966
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 42 $48,981
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 24 $39,423
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 17 $24,426

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 112 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$89,151

Of which drugs: $44,023

Medicare patients

139

Average age 74

Services billed

5,183

51 women, 88 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Heart failure 25%
Diabetes 22%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Depression 21%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 27 31 $4,819
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 34 34 $2,782

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$273 — —
Azstarys
$246 — —
BREZTRI
$236 19 —
Kerendia
$209 — —
FARXIGA
$144 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

531 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record