Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Doust

Interventional Pain Medicine Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1720171143 CMS profile 304861

3900 E Camelback Rd, Suite 190, Phoenix, AZ 85018

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,329

502 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$14,624

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$12,043,414 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Matthew Doust of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,329 across 502 general payments and $14,624 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $12,043,414 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $128 9
2024 General $332 27
2023 General $930 67
2022 General $1,167 90
2021 General $2,281 188
2020 General $505 35
2019 General $985 86
2019 Research $14,624 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Doust
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Doust were reported at $128. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Doust Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $985 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $505 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $2,281 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $1,167 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $930 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $332 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $128 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $1,690 121 payments
  2. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $870 88 payments
  3. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $785 78 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $509 46 payments
  5. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $375 31 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $338 37 payments
  7. Valinor Pharma, LLC $319 27 payments
  8. Boston Scientific Corporation $206 9 payments
  9. RedHill Biopharma Inc. $169 13 payments
  10. Medtronic USA, Inc. $159 1 payment
  11. Other $910 51 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,275 498 payments
  2. Education $34 3 payments
  3. Gift $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Proclaim IPG $990 84 payments
  2. XTAMPZA $870 88 payments
  3. RELISTOR $779 77 payments
  4. PROCLAIM $467 20 payments
  5. UBRELVY $310 27 payments
  6. MOVANTIK $293 25 payments
  7. LYRICA $286 33 payments
  8. EMBEDA $225 24 payments
  9. ZTLido $222 17 payments
  10. QULIPTA $177 18 payments
  11. Other $1,735 107 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $14,624 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 42 drugs

Part D claims

6,358

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$291,534

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

41.6%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Relistor Methylnaltrexone Bromide Brand 20 $47,056
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 139 $42,824
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 1,070 $40,479
Movantik Naloxegol Oxalate Brand 86 $36,037
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 781 $22,738
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 12 $18,692
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 873 $12,911
Lidocaine Generic 128 $12,448
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 401 $9,326
Gabapentin Generic 669 $8,773

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 42 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$80,787

Of which drugs: $16

Medicare patients

111

Average age 68

Services billed

1,155

71 women, 40 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 66%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Depression 25%
COPD 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Heart failure 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 12 190 $15

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOVANTIK
  • Valinor Pharma, LLC $221
$221 86 —
ZTLido
  • Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $47
$47 — —
RELISTOR
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $34
$34 20 —
ROXYBOND
  • PROTEGA PHARMACEUTIALS LLC $21
$21 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

503 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record