Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mateja De Leonni Stanonik

Neurology Tucson, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1730344102 CMS profile 305824

2850 E Skyline Dr Ste 130, Tucson, AZ 85718

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,116

784 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mateja De Leonni Stanonik of Tucson, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,116 across 784 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,114 133
2024 General $3,021 116
2023 General $3,428 159
2022 General $2,338 108
2021 General $2,077 86
2020 General $2,003 111
2019 General $1,135 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mateja De Leonni Stanonik
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mateja De Leonni Stanonik were reported at $3,114. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Mateja De Leonni Stanonik Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,135 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $2,003 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $2,077 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $2,338 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $3,428 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $3,021 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $3,114 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,531 70 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $1,336 68 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $736 34 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $708 40 payments
  5. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $692 25 payments
  6. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $638 27 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $637 32 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $626 29 payments
  9. Eisai Inc. $579 34 payments
  10. Lundbeck LLC $559 23 payments
  11. Other $9,074 402 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,245 772 payments
  2. Education $871 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BOTOX Hyperhydrosis $719 40 payments
  2. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $629 25 payments
  3. AUBAGIO $577 26 payments
  4. QULIPTA $553 25 payments
  5. ULTOMIRIS $511 20 payments
  6. XYWAV $480 18 payments
  7. Leqembi $447 26 payments
  8. UBRELVY $434 21 payments
  9. Briviact $416 19 payments
  10. Neupro $356 25 payments
  11. Other $12,894 588 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 68 drugs

Part D claims

4,094

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$953,815

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

22.3%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xywav Sodium,calcium,mag,pot Oxybate Brand 12 $244,190
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 75 $125,226
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 65 $117,161
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 56 $94,142
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 12 $59,185
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 89 $57,650
Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 27 $34,950
Nuedexta Dextromethorphan Hbr/Quinidine Brand 14 $30,657
Rasagiline Mesylate Generic 143 $26,797
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 21 $26,533

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 68 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$396,775

Of which drugs: $54,565

Medicare patients

475

Average age 75

Services billed

22,931

283 women, 192 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 60%
Depression 37%
Alzheimer's or dementia 29%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Osteoporosis 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 21 10,261 $50,832
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 25 8,704 $1,875
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, up to 40 mg J2920 Office 12 536 $1,760
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 144 $98

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 49 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
$238 65 10,261
WAKIX
$191 — —
KISUNLA
$173 — —
TEZSPIRE
$125 — —
LEQVIO
$122 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 49 with Patron

Records

784 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record