Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mary Labriola

Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care Montgomery, AL Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1124387659 CMS profile 10664045

1440 Narrow Lane Pkwy, Montgomery, AL 36111

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,195

713 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mary Labriola of Montgomery, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,195 across 713 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,018 168
2024 General $2,799 151
2023 General $2,173 132
2022 General $2,270 139
2021 General $1,934 123

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mary Labriola
  • Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mary Labriola were reported at $3,018. Among 11,827 Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles paid that year, the median was $152 and the middle half received between $48 and $458.

Show as a table
Year Mary Labriola Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $1,934 $123 $38–$327 $132
2022 $2,270 $130 $44–$369 $149
2023 $2,173 $144 $49–$410 $160
2024 $2,799 $146 $48–$433 $164
2025 $3,018 $152 $48–$458 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,311 94 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,118 64 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,090 64 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $981 46 payments
  5. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $758 31 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $743 44 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $700 42 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $523 30 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $445 33 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $422 23 payments
  11. Other $4,105 242 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,195 713 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,004 63 payments
  2. Ozempic $988 58 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $981 58 payments
  4. INGREZZA $758 31 payments
  5. VRAYLAR $623 55 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $567 34 payments
  7. Kerendia $523 30 payments
  8. MOUNJARO $519 28 payments
  9. XIFAXAN $477 26 payments
  10. UBRELVY $431 17 payments
  11. Other $8,115 489 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 150 drugs

Part D claims

7,856

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$820,127

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

21.4%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 118 $127,895
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 75 $72,677
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 82 $67,418
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 52 $58,619
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 69 $57,427
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 58 $45,127
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 31 $44,796
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 41 $33,309
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 35 $33,114
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 46 $31,443

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 150 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 61 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$61,375

Of which drugs: $5,601

Medicare patients

249

Average age 74

Services billed

2,338

147 women, 102 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 62%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Depression 16%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Heart failure 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 59 59 $4,808
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 58 139 $644
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 28 64 $42
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 15 56 $25
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 34 79 $22

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$271 — —
INGREZZA
$269 — —
VOQUEZNA
$225 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$214 58 —
IBSRELA
$143 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

713 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record