Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marty Allen

Infectious Disease Lexington, KY Medical Doctor

NPI 1639217391 CMS profile 28388

1720 Nicholasville Rd, Ste 602, Lexington, KY 40503

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$39,709

221 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marty Allen of Lexington, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $39,709 across 221 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,907 28
2024 General $11,400 36
2023 General $9,683 49
2022 General $6,645 34
2021 General $472 23
2020 General $442 11
2019 General $7,159 40

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marty Allen
  • Infectious Disease median
  • Middle half of Infectious Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marty Allen were reported at $3,907. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.

Show as a table
Year Marty Allen Infectious Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $7,159 $190 $60–$862 $163
2020 $442 $124 $32–$606 $114
2021 $472 $148 $38–$905 $132
2022 $6,645 $166 $50–$834 $149
2023 $9,683 $171 $57–$787 $160
2024 $11,400 $176 $52–$752 $164
2025 $3,907 $188 $57–$766 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Astellas Pharma US Inc $36,201 88 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $1,316 60 payments
  3. ViiV Healthcare Company $565 21 payments
  4. Shionogi Inc $504 13 payments
  5. Romark Laboratories, LC $380 7 payments
  6. La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company $205 4 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $136 10 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $113 1 payment
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $94 6 payments
  10. Insmed, Inc. $54 3 payments
  11. Other $141 8 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $28,730 14 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $5,468 14 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $5,402 184 payments
  4. Education $110 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Cresemba Infectious Diseases $15,806 45 payments
  2. Cresemba Infectious Diseases $14,223 28 payments
  3. Cresemba Infectious Diseases $6,142 13 payments
  4. Fetroja $504 13 payments
  5. DOVATO $500 18 payments
  6. ALINIA Gastroenterology $380 7 payments
  7. ALINIA Gastroenterology $380 7 payments
  8. ALINIA Gastroenterology $380 7 payments
  9. Veklury $224 10 payments
  10. Ambisome $161 12 payments
  11. Other $1,274 63 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

862

Median for Infectious Disease: 268

Drug cost

$251,953

Median for Infectious Disease: $217,595

Branded share of claims

29.8%

Median for Infectious Disease: 45.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 27 $99,541
Rukobia Fostemsavir Tromethamine Brand 11 $85,069
Daptomycin Generic 50 $31,377
Ertapenem Ertapenem Sodium Brand 13 $8,184
Piperacillin-Tazobactam Piperacillin Sodium/Tazobactam Brand 20 $6,304
Ceftriaxone Ceftriaxone Sodium Brand 39 $4,624
Epinephrine Generic 15 $2,715
Cefuroxime Cefuroxime Axetil Brand 46 $2,580
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 108 $2,385
Sodium Chloride 0.9 % Sodium Chloride Brand 11 $1,673

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,546 Part D prescribers listed as Infectious Disease; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$126,516

Of which drugs: $7,374

Medicare patients

268

Average age 73

Services billed

37,757

117 women, 151 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 70%
Diabetes 49%
Chronic kidney disease 47%
Depression 43%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Heart failure 38%
COPD 36%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, daptomycin, 1 mg J0878 Office 40 33,449 $1,415
Injection, ertapenem sodium, 500 mg J1335 Office 29 128 $1,134
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 50 724 $258

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cresemba
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $10,940
$10,940 — —
Fetroja
  • Shionogi Inc $88
$88 — —
VIBATIV
  • Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $52
$52 — —
CABENUVA
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $17
$17 — —
Veklury
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $12
$12 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

221 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record