Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Martin Whitaker

Ophthalmology Norway, ME Medical Doctor

NPI 1003805995 CMS profile 126

193 Main St, Norway, ME 04268

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,177

115 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Martin Whitaker of Norway, ME is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,177 across 115 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $934 15
2024 General $1,003 27
2023 General $1,005 11
2022 General $649 16
2021 General $833 22
2020 General $421 17
2019 General $332 7

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Martin Whitaker
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Martin Whitaker were reported at $934. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Martin Whitaker Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $332 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $421 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $833 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $649 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,005 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,003 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $934 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Glaukos Corporation $2,079 23 payments
  2. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $1,402 16 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $982 37 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $360 27 payments
  5. Biogen, Inc. $112 1 payment
  6. Ivantis, Inc $54 1 payment
  7. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $52 2 payments
  8. Alcon Vision LLC $51 3 payments
  9. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $23 1 payment
  10. Carl Zeiss Meditec AG $19 1 payment
  11. Other $44 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,049 111 payments
  2. Gift $109 3 payments
  3. Entertainment $19 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM $573 5 payments
  2. iStent inject W $558 6 payments
  3. Acuvue $481 7 payments
  4. Tecnis IOL Optics $436 5 payments
  5. iDose $361 3 payments
  6. iDoseTR $287 4 payments
  7. KXL System $282 4 payments
  8. Photrexa $282 4 payments
  9. Tecnis IOL Optics $276 2 payments
  10. DURYSTA $249 22 payments
  11. Other $2,435 70 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

1,789

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$326,794

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

45.1%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 208 $111,608
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 27 $41,902
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 66 $35,303
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 83 $34,731
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 61 $28,081
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 33 $13,855
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 292 $10,647
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 61 $9,671
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 13 $8,341
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 28 $8,225

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,748,780

Of which drugs: $1,444,126

Medicare patients

533

Average age 79

Services billed

13,631

327 women, 206 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 38%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Depression 21%
COPD 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 110 1,340 $880,828
Injection, ranibizumab-nuna, biosimilar, (byooviz), 0.1 mg Q5124 Office 41 1,265 $169,579
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 11 504 $132,777
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 16 1,125 $131,491
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 15 469 $59,103
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 25 94 $5,251

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $114
$114 208 —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $30
$30 — 504
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $20
$20 — —
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $14
$14 66 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

115 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Maine

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record