Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Martin Lyons

Family Medicine Wetumpka, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1356640379 CMS profile 243440

41 Cambridge Ct, Wetumpka, AL 36093

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,421

1,037 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Martin Lyons of Wetumpka, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,421 across 1,037 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,389 179
2024 General $3,698 193
2023 General $2,846 168
2022 General $2,523 154
2021 General $2,507 178
2020 General $1,577 99
2019 General $882 66

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Martin Lyons
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Martin Lyons were reported at $3,389. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Martin Lyons Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $882 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,577 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,507 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,523 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,846 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $3,698 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $3,389 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,541 108 payments
  2. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $1,499 62 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,473 91 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,401 68 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,328 85 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,009 63 payments
  7. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $855 59 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $826 51 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $673 54 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $650 35 payments
  11. Other $6,165 361 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,321 1,036 payments
  2. Education $100 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INGREZZA $1,499 62 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,188 76 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,072 76 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $1,068 67 payments
  5. REXULTI $838 58 payments
  6. FARXIGA $747 37 payments
  7. XARELTO $673 54 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $656 60 payments
  9. Kerendia $650 35 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $644 39 payments
  11. Other $12,481 744 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 205 drugs

Part D claims

17,805

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$2,059,771

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

21.6%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 323 $269,658
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 133 $190,600
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 17 $179,242
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 160 $132,998
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 106 $128,797
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 99 $112,278
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 90 $91,391
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 100 $80,493
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 68 $61,957
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 35 $49,163

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 205 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 87 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$145,331

Of which drugs: $8,542

Medicare patients

406

Average age 75

Services billed

6,935

200 women, 206 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Diabetes 29%
Osteoporosis 25%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 100 100 $8,008
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 53 2,444 $188
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 35 183 $151
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 19 19 $60
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 42 125 $60
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 15 70 $21
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 72 229 $17

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 42 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
INGREZZA
$521 17 —
AIRSUPRA
$329 — —
VOQUEZNA
$304 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$251 99 —
Kerendia
$182 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 42 with Patron

Records

1,037 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record