Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Martin Kay

Dermatology Burbank, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1750450615 CMS profile 124604

1411 N Hollywood Way, Burbank, CA 91505

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,683

1,040 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$5,561 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2023

Through program year 2025, Martin Kay of Burbank, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,683 across 1,040 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $5,561 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,373 152
2024 General $4,432 247
2023 General $3,789 165
2022 General $3,861 143
2021 General $2,242 121
2020 General $1,757 90
2019 General $2,230 122

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Martin Kay
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Martin Kay were reported at $3,373. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Martin Kay Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,230 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $1,757 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $2,242 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $3,861 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $3,789 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $4,432 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,373 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,094 223 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,474 93 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $1,652 48 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,577 68 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,398 56 payments
  6. Merz North America, Inc. $1,372 8 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,007 50 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $941 33 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $919 44 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $904 58 payments
  11. Other $6,346 359 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,186 1,032 payments
  2. Education $495 7 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $2,349 85 payments
  2. DUPIXENT $1,743 51 payments
  3. TALTZ $1,263 62 payments
  4. RINVOQ $1,205 103 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $1,115 69 payments
  6. ILUMYA $889 36 payments
  7. CIBINQO $811 41 payments
  8. STELARA $776 43 payments
  9. EUCRISA $736 37 payments
  10. OPZELURA $718 50 payments
  11. Other $12,560 655 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

1,070

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$923,800

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

22.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 35 $239,891
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 14 $187,404
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 11 $141,631
Cibinqo Abrocitinib Brand 19 $130,374
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 31 $116,545
Sotyktu Deucravacitinib Brand 12 $84,562
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 149 $6,322
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 55 $3,754
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 195 $2,282
Imiquimod Generic 60 $1,626

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 88 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$509,856

Of which drugs: $6,883

Medicare patients

1,029

Average age 74

Services billed

5,489

556 women, 473 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 56%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Depression 27%
Osteoporosis 21%
COPD 19%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 23 92 $68
Injection, cefazolin sodium, 500 mg J0690 Office 12 12 $7

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$641 31 —
RINVOQ
$477 35 —
TREMFYA
$412 14 —
OLUMIANT
$199 — —
COSENTYX
$191 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

1,040 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record