Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Martin Fejka

Interventional Cardiology Wheat Ridge, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1578521233 CMS profile 25460

3655 Lutheran Parkway, Suite #201, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,791

68 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Martin Fejka of Wheat Ridge, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,791 across 68 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 25th percentile of Interventional Cardiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $209 11
2023 General $82 3
2022 General $273 6
2021 General $266 7
2020 General $162 8
2019 General $1,799 33

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Martin Fejka
  • Interventional Cardiology median
  • Middle half of Interventional Cardiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Martin Fejka were reported at $0. Among 6,173 Interventional Cardiology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,092 and the middle half received between $366 and $3,019.

Show as a table
Year Martin Fejka Interventional Cardiology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,799 $1,097 $329–$3,048 $163
2020 $162 $473 $161–$1,480 $114
2021 $266 $677 $233–$1,827 $132
2022 $273 $978 $333–$2,724 $149
2023 $82 $1,136 $382–$2,986 $160
2024 $209 $1,181 $395–$3,326 $164
2025 $0 $1,092 $366–$3,019 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $1,302 24 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $295 4 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $251 13 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $246 4 payments
  5. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $227 7 payments
  6. Abiomed $182 2 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $74 4 payments
  8. Asahi Intecc USA, Inc. $38 1 payment
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $38 2 payments
  10. Cardiovascular Systems Inc. $33 1 payment
  11. Other $106 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Food and Beverage $2,171 66 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $600 1 payment
  3. Education $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Turbo-Power $600 1 payment
  2. IGT D Coronary $538 15 payments
  3. Resolute $227 7 payments
  4. ELIQUIS $193 11 payments
  5. Impella $182 2 payments
  6. MitraClip System $154 1 payment
  7. General Therapies $121 1 payment
  8. MITRACLIP $104 1 payment
  9. (8333) IGT D Coronary $92 5 payments
  10. General - Therapies $85 1 payment
  11. Other $843 41 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 42 drugs

Part D claims

4,608

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$563,149

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

19.8%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 214 $241,185
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 150 $183,102
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 29 $43,944
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 23 $28,848
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 16 $11,056
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 18 $10,222
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 681 $5,570
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 325 $4,208
Clopidogrel Clopidogrel Bisulfate Brand 326 $3,949
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 418 $3,877

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 42 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 88 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$189,729

Of which drugs: $414

Medicare patients

821

Average age 75

Services billed

2,896

417 women, 404 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 53%
Arthritis 48%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Atrial fibrillation 36%
Heart failure 34%
Diabetes 32%
COPD 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 16 64 $398

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $35
$35 214 —
CAMZYOS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $21
$21 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $20
$20 18 —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $18
$18 — —
PAXLOVID
  • PFIZER INC. $17
$17 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

68 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Cardiology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record