Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Martin Cerda

Cardiovascular Disease Scottsdale, AZ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1952644312 CMS profile 1401605

10101 N 92Nd St Ste 101, Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$66,161

259 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Martin Cerda of Scottsdale, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $66,161 across 259 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,041 76
2024 General $2,107 49
2023 General $1,150 39
2022 General $399 12
2021 General $27,452 72
2020 General $32,586 6
2019 General $426 5

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Martin Cerda
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Martin Cerda were reported at $2,041. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Martin Cerda Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $426 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $32,586 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $27,452 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $399 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $1,150 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $2,107 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $2,041 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $25,030 3 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $13,508 13 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $10,229 8 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $10,166 42 payments
  5. Biotronik Inc. $2,484 24 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $796 22 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $550 28 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $485 24 payments
  9. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $375 2 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $281 9 payments
  11. Other $2,256 84 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Grant $53,961 8 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $8,292 227 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,364 21 payments
  4. Education $545 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EMBLEM $7,500 1 payment
  2. GENERAL - BRADY $5,000 1 payment
  3. Rivacor $2,291 22 payments
  4. Edora $2,291 22 payments
  5. Acticor $2,291 22 payments
  6. Arctic Front $1,623 15 payments
  7. Solia $1,496 20 payments
  8. BioMonitor $1,496 20 payments
  9. Sentus $795 2 payments
  10. Plexa $795 2 payments
  11. Other $7,236 214 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

2,835

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$688,858

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

26.4%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 291 $316,692
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 98 $128,570
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 79 $117,704
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 56 $54,542
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 24 $29,288
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 14 $10,928
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 255 $4,082
Flecainide Acetate Generic 58 $2,954
Losartan Potassium Generic 307 $2,647
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 160 $2,279

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$177,321

Of which drugs: $1,835

Medicare patients

864

Average age 76

Services billed

2,901

411 women, 453 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 48%
Atrial fibrillation 33%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Cancer 22%
Heart failure 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 44 176 $1,835

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
CAMZYOS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $240
$240 — —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $185
$185 — —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $78
  • PFIZER INC. $44
$122 291 —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $54
$54 24 —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $38
$38 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

259 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record