Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marta Hampton

Dermatopathology Charleston, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1952403446 CMS profile 361343

635 Saint Andrews Blvd, Charleston, SC 29407

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$24,448

369 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,290 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Marta Hampton of Charleston, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $24,448 across 369 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,290 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Dermatopathology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,736 49
2024 General $1,742 50
2023 General $3,523 67
2022 General $905 41
2021 General $3,436 22
2020 General $598 22
2019 General $12,508 118

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marta Hampton
  • Dermatopathology median
  • Middle half of Dermatopathology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marta Hampton were reported at $1,736. Among 238 Dermatopathology profiles paid that year, the median was $251 and the middle half received between $93 and $1,140.

Show as a table
Year Marta Hampton Dermatopathology median Middle half National median
2019 $12,508 $295 $101–$807 $163
2020 $598 $154 $53–$443 $114
2021 $3,436 $226 $66–$781 $132
2022 $905 $258 $76–$906 $149
2023 $3,523 $303 $93–$1,129 $160
2024 $1,742 $324 $101–$1,343 $164
2025 $1,736 $251 $93–$1,140 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $13,438 50 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,853 61 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,460 37 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,434 47 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,425 25 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $519 11 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $463 16 payments
  8. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $443 8 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $410 10 payments
  10. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $382 7 payments
  11. Other $2,622 97 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,308 348 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $8,230 4 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $4,180 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $959 5 payments
  5. Education $771 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. COSENTYX Immunology $8,828 15 payments
  2. COSENTYX Dermatology $4,194 21 payments
  3. TREMFYA $1,406 34 payments
  4. ILUMYA $951 40 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $830 38 payments
  6. DUPIXENT $483 18 payments
  7. RINVOQ $422 8 payments
  8. COSENTYX Dermatology $386 13 payments
  9. VTAMA $382 7 payments
  10. HUMIRA $363 11 payments
  11. Other $5,468 194 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

1,591

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$569,408

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

23.4%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 12 $204,285
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 35 $155,791
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 11 $154,737
Jublia Efinaconazole Brand 19 $13,879
Metronidazole Generic 90 $5,255
Ciclopirox Ciclopirox Olamine Brand 189 $4,559
Ketoconazole Generic 230 $3,700
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 87 $3,032
Calcipotriene Generic 12 $2,711
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 55 $2,656

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$258,220

Of which drugs: $32

Medicare patients

1,317

Average age 76

Services billed

5,987

835 women, 482 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 50%
Osteoporosis 26%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Diabetes 21%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Cancer 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 23 48 $32

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $398
$398 11 —
ILUMYA
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $140
$140 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $127
$127 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $126
$126 — —
LEVULAN KERASTICK
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $118
$118 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

369 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatopathology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record