Who Paid My Doc
Mark Twite
Pediatric Anesthesiology Aurora, CO Medical Doctor
NPI 1215085501 CMS profile 909944
13123 E 16Th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045
General payments
$71,966
Research payments
$518
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Research they led as principal investigator
$748
Through program year 2025, Mark Twite of Aurora, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $71,966 across 50 general payments and $518 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $748 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.
General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Pediatric Anesthesiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
8 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $57 | 1 | |
| 2024 | General | $3,725 | 2 | |
| 2023 | General | $29,581 | 13 | |
| 2022 | General | $22,406 | 14 | |
| 2021 | General | $9,523 | 13 | |
| 2020 | General | $3,020 | 2 | |
| 2019 | General | $3,654 | 5 | |
| 2019 | Research | $518 | 1 |
Beside peers
- Mark Twite
- Pediatric Anesthesiology median
- Middle half of Pediatric Anesthesiology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Twite were reported at $57. Among 387 Pediatric Anesthesiology profiles paid that year, the median was $41 and the middle half received between $21 and $103.
Show as a table
| Year | Mark Twite | Pediatric Anesthesiology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $3,654 | $87 | $23–$151 | $163 |
| 2020 | $3,020 | $36 | $16–$140 | $114 |
| 2021 | $9,523 | $49 | $19–$142 | $132 |
| 2022 | $22,406 | $36 | $19–$132 | $149 |
| 2023 | $29,581 | $39 | $22–$123 | $160 |
| 2024 | $3,725 | $41 | $23–$129 | $164 |
| 2025 | $57 | $41 | $21–$103 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Records
51 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Pediatric Anesthesiology in Colorado
Randall Clark
Pediatric Anesthesiology · Aurora, CO
Jeffrey Galinkin
Pediatric Anesthesiology · Aurora, CO
Lawrence Schwartz
Pediatric Anesthesiology · Aurora, CO
Richard Ing
Pediatric Anesthesiology · Aurora, CO
Nicholas Houska
Pediatric Anesthesiology · Aurora, CO
Megan Brockel
Pediatric Anesthesiology · Aurora, CO
Related records
Pediatric Anesthesiology in Colorado
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Pediatric Anesthesiology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Colorado
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.